2011
DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2010.0022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of the potential of drylands in eight sub-Saharan African countries to produce bioenergy feedstocks

Abstract: This paper synthesizes lessons learnt from research that aimed to identify land in the dryland regions of eight sub-Saharan African study countries where bioenergy feedstocks production has a low risk of detrimental environmental and socio-economic effects. The methodology involved using geographical information systems (GISs) to interrogate a wide range of datasets, aerial photograph and field verification, an extensive literature review, and obtaining information from a wide range of stakeholders. The GIS wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GIS-based land mapping identified suitable land where well-managed intensification of, or conversion to, bioenergy feedstock would have a low risk of causing detrimental effects (Watson and Diaz-Chavez 2011). Excluded from this potentially suitable land stock were all areas important for biodiversity, carbon stocks, environmental services, food security, rural livelihoods, and all protected areas.…”
Section: Project Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GIS-based land mapping identified suitable land where well-managed intensification of, or conversion to, bioenergy feedstock would have a low risk of causing detrimental effects (Watson and Diaz-Chavez 2011). Excluded from this potentially suitable land stock were all areas important for biodiversity, carbon stocks, environmental services, food security, rural livelihoods, and all protected areas.…”
Section: Project Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2010, the Society ran a meeting at Chatham House to look at issues of land-use change, sponsored by the Energy Biosciences Institute at the Universities of Berkeley and Illinois (Urbana-Champaign), the Porter Institute at Imperial College and Chatham House itself. The papers by Davis et al [3], Khanna et al [5], Hosseini & Shah [7] and Watson & Diaz-Chavez [8] arose from the discussions and debates that were held then.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%