1979
DOI: 10.1016/0584-8547(79)80042-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of the laser microprobe analyzer as a tool for quantitative analysis in atomic emission spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, most methods for resolution of catalysts have relied on fixed-time, single-point determinations of activity in which catalysts are differentiated by extents of inhibition rather than by inhibition rate constants. Multipoint methods, however, reduce errors due to variability in rate constants (6), produce statistics which can be used to detect model errors (7), and provide data for the determination of three or more catalysts from a single set of kinetic data (8). The last advantage is particularly significant because single-point, fixed-time methods require measurements for the same number of different conditions as there are catalysts to be resolved.…”
Section: Mathematical Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To date, most methods for resolution of catalysts have relied on fixed-time, single-point determinations of activity in which catalysts are differentiated by extents of inhibition rather than by inhibition rate constants. Multipoint methods, however, reduce errors due to variability in rate constants (6), produce statistics which can be used to detect model errors (7), and provide data for the determination of three or more catalysts from a single set of kinetic data (8). The last advantage is particularly significant because single-point, fixed-time methods require measurements for the same number of different conditions as there are catalysts to be resolved.…”
Section: Mathematical Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the use of different power and wavelength conditions, neutral particles (such as atoms, clusters, and molecules) and ions can be generated in the laser plasma. However, laser microprobe analysis still remains a qualitative or semiquantitative method (3,7) due to the uncertainties arising from the laser power fluctuations, matrix effects, surface conditions, and focusing conditions. Since the amount of material produced by the laser vaporization process depends on the pulse-to-pulse laser power stability (most modern pulsed lasers provide <5% fluctuation), a large error can still be obtained by normalizing the amount of material evaporated to the laser power (8,9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the power density range from 10 4 to 10 7 W cm 02 , the resulting vapor consists of polyatomic particles and molecular species (24). The relatively low power density used in this work probably gave rise to droplets and clusters (41). To improve the analytical performance, at least an order of magnitude increase in the laser power density would be needed to ensure a complete vaporization and well controlled particle size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The laser atomization process has been employed for direct solid sample introduction in a variety of excitation and ionization sources, including ICP emission [3,4], arc/spark emission [5,6], direct current plasma sources (DCP) [7], and ICP mass spectrometry [8]. The laser has also been used as a direct source for atomic emission [6,9] and ablated neutral atoms have permitted atomic absorption analyses [10,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%