1999
DOI: 10.1080/07900629949023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of the Impact of Participatory Irrigation Management in Sri Lanka

Abstract: This paper presents the results of a study on the effects of participatory irrigation management in Sri Lanka. The study is based on the application of a methodology developed by the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) to assess the impact of irrigation management transfer on the performance of irrigated agriculture. Performance is measured from several perspectives: ® nancial, irrigation management, and agricultural productivity levels. Piecewise linear regression models are ® tted to compare tren… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Van Halsema et al (2011) also observed positive outcomes of WUAs in managing the Haleku scheme in the central rift valley of Ethiopia, under conditions of abundant water availability, fewer conflicts over water use and minimal incentives for enforcing by-laws. Similarly, transferring the management of irrigation schemes to farmers and accompanying the transfer with physical rehabilitation of schemes in Sri Lanka have brought some marginal improvements in agricultural production (Samad & Vermillion, 1999). In contrast, poor achievements were reported for WUAs in countries in Asia (Chandran et al, 2001;Abdullaev et al, 2010) and Africa (Brown, 2011) due to the top-down approaches used in implementing WUAs and too much or too little state intervention.…”
Section: Wuas and Community Participation In Ssi Systemsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Van Halsema et al (2011) also observed positive outcomes of WUAs in managing the Haleku scheme in the central rift valley of Ethiopia, under conditions of abundant water availability, fewer conflicts over water use and minimal incentives for enforcing by-laws. Similarly, transferring the management of irrigation schemes to farmers and accompanying the transfer with physical rehabilitation of schemes in Sri Lanka have brought some marginal improvements in agricultural production (Samad & Vermillion, 1999). In contrast, poor achievements were reported for WUAs in countries in Asia (Chandran et al, 2001;Abdullaev et al, 2010) and Africa (Brown, 2011) due to the top-down approaches used in implementing WUAs and too much or too little state intervention.…”
Section: Wuas and Community Participation In Ssi Systemsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The WUA ensures voluntary and active involvement of farmers in all decisions and activities related to the irrigation water management programme. It develops a process and group dynamics in which affected populations collectively discuss and work out ways and means to tackle their own problems rather than waiting for others to do it for them (Samad and Vermillion, 1999). The group dynamics plays a pivotal role in the functioning of the group in an efficient manner.…”
Section: Impact Assessment Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stakeholder participation is the main focus of IMT, hence it is sometimes referred to as participatory irrigation management; see e.g. Samad and Vermillion (1999) and Yildirim and Çakmak (2004).…”
Section: The Concept Of Imtmentioning
confidence: 99%