2021
DOI: 10.2196/preprints.35290
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of the impact of occupational health workers' activities on the workers' health: Preliminary results and protocol of a nationwide Internet-based longitudinal survey (Preprint)

Abstract: BACKGROUND Due to the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, work environments and systems, as well as occupational health measures or activities that fall within our research field, are constantly changing. We consider it necessary to assess the impact of these changes on the physical and mental health of workers. OBJECTIVE To assess how occupational health measures affect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study adopted a cross-sectional design using the data from the baseline of the WSHIR study. Details of the protocol of this survey are reported elsewhere 6) . To improve the validity of this study, we adhered to the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys or CHERRIES statement 7,8) .…”
Section: Study Design and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study adopted a cross-sectional design using the data from the baseline of the WSHIR study. Details of the protocol of this survey are reported elsewhere 6) . To improve the validity of this study, we adhered to the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys or CHERRIES statement 7,8) .…”
Section: Study Design and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed consistency and completeness checks after the questionnaires were submitted. We separated fraudulent respondents from all respondents based on three types of algorithms designed within this survey 6) . There were 571 participants excluded by consistency and completeness checks; finally, 4,540 eligible participants were included in the study.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%