2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.wace.2022.100461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of the extremes and impacts of the February 2021 South-Central U.S. Arctic outbreak, and how climate services can help

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ensemble members from both the ECMWF and NCEP models which correctly simulate these two wave breaks later simulate anomalous cold in the Great Plains in comparison to those ensemble members which do not, at a ∼3‐week lead time (Figures 4 and 5). These findings link with recent studies that suggested the February 2021 CAO was a result of tropospheric variability (Bolinger et al., 2022; Davis et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022). The analysis of the Rossby wave breaking events preceding the February 2021 event also demonstrates their links to persistent anomalous ridges over the East Siberian Sea and northern Canada/Greenland (Masato et al., 2012; Pelly & Hoskins, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ensemble members from both the ECMWF and NCEP models which correctly simulate these two wave breaks later simulate anomalous cold in the Great Plains in comparison to those ensemble members which do not, at a ∼3‐week lead time (Figures 4 and 5). These findings link with recent studies that suggested the February 2021 CAO was a result of tropospheric variability (Bolinger et al., 2022; Davis et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022). The analysis of the Rossby wave breaking events preceding the February 2021 event also demonstrates their links to persistent anomalous ridges over the East Siberian Sea and northern Canada/Greenland (Masato et al., 2012; Pelly & Hoskins, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Significant attention has been given to the role of the stratospheric polar vortex in the February 2021 CAO, given that a major sudden stratospheric warming occurred around 1 month prior (Lee, 2021). However, recent studies concluded that the stratosphere had a minimal direct role in the February 2021 CAO; rather, tropospheric variability may have been more important in its evolution (Bolinger et al., 2022; Davis et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As global warming is expected to reduce the frequency of severe cold spells, the causes of recent winter cold extremes in the Northern Hemisphere have attracted much public attention and scientific debate 1 6 . Notably, the exceptional North American cold wave in February 2021 was suggested to be related to the sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) in January 2021 7 , 8 , which was further proposed to be linked to Arctic sea ice loss under global warming 3 , 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concurrently, stronger than normal winds were observed including over parts of SERC and WECC and weaker winds were observed over NPCC (figure 3(j)). However, these negative anomalies over NPCC are not typical during cold extremes and are likely due to the winter storm's extreme southward extent (Bolinger et al 2022). Typically, positive median wind anomalies in this region during widespread cold extremes (figure 3(c)) are likely because the region generally lies at the leading edge of cold air outbreaks that are most often centered around central US.…”
Section: Solar and Wind Energy Potentialmentioning
confidence: 97%