2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21134351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of the Effect of Progressive Water Absorption on the Interlaminar Strength of Unidirectional Carbon/Epoxy Composites Using Acoustic Emission

Abstract: Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Polymers (CFRPs) in aerospace applications are expected to operate in moist environments where carbon fibres have high resistance to water absorption; however, polymers do not. To develop a truly optimised structure, it is important to understand this degradation process. This study aims to expand the understanding of the role of water absorption on fibrous/polymeric structures, particularly in a matrix-dominant property, namely interlaminar strength. This work used Acoustic Emission (A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple damage modes may occur at the same time due to the anisotropy of composite laminates, resulting in confusion between fiber/matrix debonding and matrix-cracking damage. 35,36 A small portion of the signal from matrix cracking is similar to fiber/matrix debonding in terms of frequency and amplitude characteristics as shown in Figure 4c,d, it may lead to the AE signal of matrix cracking being easily identified as fiber/matrix debonding. The PPV of the prediction model for MLG-GFRP composites is >99%, 90%, and >99% respectively.…”
Section: Performance Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple damage modes may occur at the same time due to the anisotropy of composite laminates, resulting in confusion between fiber/matrix debonding and matrix-cracking damage. 35,36 A small portion of the signal from matrix cracking is similar to fiber/matrix debonding in terms of frequency and amplitude characteristics as shown in Figure 4c,d, it may lead to the AE signal of matrix cracking being easily identified as fiber/matrix debonding. The PPV of the prediction model for MLG-GFRP composites is >99%, 90%, and >99% respectively.…”
Section: Performance Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 6b, the PPV of the prediction model for GFRP composites is 98%, 89% and 98% respectively, which visually evaluates the performance of classification prediction models. Multiple damage modes may occur at the same time due to the anisotropy of composite laminates, resulting in confusion between fiber/matrix debonding and matrix‐cracking damage 35,36 . A small portion of the signal from matrix cracking is similar to fiber/matrix debonding in terms of frequency and amplitude characteristics as shown in Figure 4c,d, it may lead to the AE signal of matrix cracking being easily identified as fiber/matrix debonding.…”
Section: Model and Ae Database Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%