An assessment of the economic contribution of EU aquaculture production and the influence of policies for its sustainable development

Abstract

This review paper examines the structure of the EU aquaculture sector, the contribution it makes to the EU economy and the policy environment for past and future development. The primary analysis uses statistical data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations which has been re-categorized according to species groups established by the European Aquaculture Technology and Innovation Platform (EATiP) and by culture system type using expert knowledge. Additional data sources for the analysis include the European Market Observatory for Fisheries and Aquaculture Products (EUMOFA) and the European Commission Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries. EU aquaculture production was 1.34 million tonnes in 2012 with a first sale value of €4.76 billion. Shellfish comprised 45 % by volume and 28 % by value; marine fish 30 % by volume and 53 % by value; and freshwater fish 25 % by volume and 19 % by value. The total production volume has actually fallen slightly from 1.4 million tonnes in 2000, whilst the value has increased significantly from 2.79 billion in 2000, mainly due to a growth in Atlantic salmon production. Five countries accounted for around 78 % of the direct output value of EU aquaculture in 2012, the UK, France, Greece, Italy and Spain. Around 50 % of the direct output value was generated using marine cage systems (28 % by volume), whilst less than 3 % of value was generated in recirculated aquaculture systems (\1.5 % by volume). Around 5 % of value was contributed by extensive to semi-intensive inland and coastal pond systems. STECF (2014) estimates there are between 14,000 and 15,000 aquaculture enterprises in the EU employing around 80,000 people, approximately 40,000 full-time equivalent (FTE). The greatest number of jobs (FTE) is provided by the freshwater pond and suspended shellfish sectors due to much lower productivity figures. This could be seen as a social benefit in rural and coastal regions, but corresponding low wages could also discourage young entrants to the industry and lead to dependency on migrant workers. Where efficiencies can be improved through capital investment there is likely to be significant scope for consolidation of ownership as can be observed in the marine fish sector. The output from aquaculture has to find a place within the wider fish and seafood market where volumes are generally inversely related to price. The potential growth of the sector is therefore constrained both in relation to the overall market and with respect to competition from substitute products. These include product from EU capture fisheries as well as imports from third countries (sourced from aquaculture and capture fisheries). Whilst interactions between individual products can be hard to demonstrate, any increase in production costs is likely to lead to lower output volumes, whilst improvements in production efficiency can lead to increased output volumes. With around 60 % of EU fish and seafood supply obtained through imports, and little prospect of incre...

Unravelling the potential of halophytes for marine integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA)— a perspective on performance, opportunities and challenges

“…These limit investment and result in the lack of innovation in system design and process optimization. Additionally, promotion of public awareness and political support of these production systems are needed (Feucht & Zander 2015, Bostock et al 2016.…”

Site fidelity of farmed gilthead seabream Sparus aurata escapees in a coastal environment of the Adriatic Sea

“…In line with global trends, growth perspectives of marine Mediterranean aquaculture suggest that production volumes will in crease by a further 55% to 2030, and will focus on established production species, such as gilthead seabream Sparus aurata and European seabass Dicentrarchus labrax (Bostock et al 2016). To retain the competitiveness and sustainable growth of aquaculture, research priorities are oriented toward minimizing environmental impacts.…”

Constraining Factors in Hungarian Carp Farming: An Econometric Perspective

“…Its share in global freshwater aquaculture production dropped from 9.3% in 1990 to 1.0% in 2015 [3]. Pond-based carp aquaculture is one of the most important segments in EU aquaculture both in terms of production quantity and employment [7]. The output of carp farming in the EU has recently been levelled off at about 80,000-90,000 t/year [3]: neither fish pond areas nor yields have increased compared to their respective levels in the late 1980s.…”

“…This reduction of production is attributed to different issues; predation from wild birds (cormorants, herons) and disease (koi herpes virus). Carp markets have remained traditional in the Central European States supermarkets have replaced traditional markets with other seafood and fish products [7,11].…”

“…Part of the production growth should be originated from pond-based aquaculture [7]. Identification of the barriers to growth and understanding constraining mechanisms are essential for the successful implementation of the development strategy.…”