An assessment of the clinical skills of fourth-year students at four New England medical schools

Abstract

This paper describes a collaborative effort among five New England medical schools to assess important clinical skills of fourth-year medical students graduating in the class of 1988; results are presented from the four schools that provided sufficient data. Faculty from each school developed 36 patient cases representing a variety of common ambulatory-care problems. Over the course of a day, each student, on average, interacted with 16 different standardized patients, who were nonphysicians trained to accurately and consistently portray a patient in a simulated clinical setting. The students obtained focused histories, performed relevant physical examinations, and provided the patients with education and counseling. At each school, the performance of a small number of the students fell below standards set by the faculty. These deficiencies were not detected with the evaluation strategies currently being used. Although the use of standardized patients should not substitute for the process of faculty observing students as they interact with real patients, it appears that standardized patients can provide faculty with important information, not readily available from other sources, about students' performances of essential clinical activities and the levels of their clinical skills.

Evaluation of Resident Performance and Intensive Bedside Teaching during Direct Observation

“…Therefore, they may not have the opportunity to observe every single skill. Review of System (pertinent to HPI) 5 …”

Validity and reliability of undergraduate performance assessments in an anesthesia simulator

“…5,6 Due to the nature of the practice of anesthesia, standardized patients have limitations as assessment techniques but simulation technology offers exciting opportunities for exploration of standardized evaluation methods. 7 The use of 'bench model simulations' has been introduced in the surgical training program at the University of Toronto to test technical skills.…”

La utilización del Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) en estudiantes de medicina

“…Sin embargo, las puntuaciones de los estudiantes con estos métodos no se correlacionan necesariamente con la adquisición de habilidades clínicas y, cuando se utilizan en evaluaciones sumativas, no les proporcionan el feedback oportuno para que los estudiantes mejoren su rendimiento [22]. Para contrarrestar estas limitaciones se han sugerido otras alternativas, como la evaluación clínica objetiva estructurada (ECOE) y la evaluación con pacientes estandarizados, pero son demasiado caras y requieren demasiado tiempo para utilizarlas como una valoración habitual en estudiantes de medicina [17].…”