An assessment of the carbon balance of Arctic tundra: comparisons among observations, process models, and atmospheric inversions

Abstract

Although Arctic tundra has been estimated to cover only 8% of the global land surface, the large and potentially labile carbon pools currently stored in tundra soils have the potential for large emissions of carbon (C) under a warming climate. These emissions as radiatively active greenhouse gases in the form of both CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> could amplify global warming. Given the potential sensitivity of these ecosystems to climate change and the expectation that the Arctic will experience appreciable warming over the next century, it is important to assess whether responses of C exchange in tundra regions are likely to enhance or mitigate warming. In this study we compared analyses of C exchange of Arctic tundra between 1990 and 2006 among observations, regional and global applications of process-based terrestrial biosphere models, and atmospheric inversion models. Syntheses of flux observations and inversion models indicate that the annual exchange of CO<sub>2</sub> between Arctic tundra and the atmosphere has large uncertainties that cannot be distinguished from neutral balance. The mean estimate from an ensemble of process-based model simulations suggests that Arctic tundra has acted as a sink for atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> in recent decades, but based on the uncertainty estimates it cannot be determined with confidence whether these ecosystems represent a weak or a strong sink. Tundra was 0.6 °C warmer in the 2000s compared to the 1990s. The central estimates of the observations, process-based models, and inversion models each identify stronger sinks in the 2000s compared with the 1990s. Some of the process models indicate that this occurred because net primary production increased more in response to warming than heterotrophic respiration. Similarly, the observations and the applications of regional process-based models suggest that CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from Arctic tundra have increased from the 1990s to 2000s because of the sensitivity of CH<sub>4</sub> emissions to warmer temperatures. Based on our analyses of the estimates from observations, process-based models, and inversion models, we estimate that Arctic tundra was a sink for atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> of 110 Tg C yr<sup>−1</sup> (uncertainty between a sink of 291 Tg C yr<sup>−1</sup> and a source of 80 Tg C yr<sup>−1</sup>) and a source of CH<sub>4</sub> to the atmosphere of 19 Tg C yr<sup>−1</sup> (uncertainty between sources of 8 and 29 Tg C yr<sup>−1</sup>). The suite of analyses conducted in this study indicate that it is important to reduce uncertainties in the observations, process-based models, and inversions in order to better understand the degree to which Arctic tundra is influencing atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations. The reduction of uncertainties can be accomplished through (1) the strategic placement of more CO<sub&g...

An estimate of the terrestrial carbon budget of Russia using inventory-based, eddy covariance and inversion methods

“…However, the fire emissions in these studies are substantially higher than the empirical estimates ( Shvidenko et al, 2011). Note that McGuire et al (2012) find a different tendency, albeit not with the complete current set of DGVMs. It is the correct description of the relative temperature sensitivity to photosynthesis and respiration that in the first instance produces the climate sensitivity of the high latitude carbon fluxes.…”

North America's net terrestrial CO<sub>2</sub> exchange with the atmosphere 1990–2009

“…To these forest land and crop land estimates we also added the estimates of net land-atmosphere CO 2 exchange for the "tundra" region of North America (i.e., Alaska and northern Canada), as reported in the study by McGuire et al (2012). That study also included modeled estimates, but here we used a synthesis of the observations as analogous to an "inventory" of that region's carbon fluxes.…”

Exchange of CO<sub>2</sub> in Arctic tundra: impacts of meteorological variations and biological disturbance

“…With continued warming temperature and longer growing seasons, tundra systems will likely have enhanced GPP and R eco rates, but long-term data with which to investigate and quantify these responses are rare. Further, the effects on net CO 2 sequestration are not known, and may be altered by long-term processes such as vegetation shifts and short-term disturbances like insect pest outbreaks, complicating the prognostic forecast of upcoming C states (Callaghan et al, 2012b;McGuire et al, 2012). Consequently, there is a need to understand how the C cycle behaves over timescales from days to years and the links to environmental drivers.…”