2008
DOI: 10.1897/ieam_2007-053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of the Application Factor Used to Derive the Saltwater Acute Ambient Water Quality Copper Criterion

Abstract: The basis for all US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) acute ambient water quality criteria is the chemical specific final acute value (FAV; an estimate of the concentration of the chemical corresponding to a cumulative probability of 0.05 of acute toxicity values for all genera with which acceptable acute tests have been conducted). The acute criterion for all chemicals is equal to the chemical's FAV divided by an application factor of 2. The intention of dividing the FAV by a factor of 2 is to convert … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum-acceptabletoxicant concentration (MATC) or the ''chronic values'' (ChVs) defined by Stephan et al (1985), was estimated as the geometric means of the LOEC and NOEC values. Although NOEC, LOEC, MATC (ChVs) in this study could not be obtained through way of hypothesis testing, some researchers indicated that the most similar toxic effect endpoint estimates were EC1 & NOEC, EC10 & ChV, and EC20 & LOEC (Arnold and Jeffrey 2008). The NOEC (EC1), MATC (EC10) and LOEC (EC20) through point estimates were calculated as 3.01, 1.78, and 1.11 lg Cd/l, respectively, based on R 0 = 53.89 -23.32 Log (Measured Cd) (R 2 = 0.96, P \ 0.01) of regression equation in this study, because the population growth rate has been proposed as a more relevant measurement of toxicant effects than traditional measures of mortality or reproduction in chemical risk assessment (Barata et al 2002a) and net reproductive rate was considered as the most sensitive end point of metal toxicity to M. monogolica .…”
Section: Notementioning
confidence: 69%
“…The maximum-acceptabletoxicant concentration (MATC) or the ''chronic values'' (ChVs) defined by Stephan et al (1985), was estimated as the geometric means of the LOEC and NOEC values. Although NOEC, LOEC, MATC (ChVs) in this study could not be obtained through way of hypothesis testing, some researchers indicated that the most similar toxic effect endpoint estimates were EC1 & NOEC, EC10 & ChV, and EC20 & LOEC (Arnold and Jeffrey 2008). The NOEC (EC1), MATC (EC10) and LOEC (EC20) through point estimates were calculated as 3.01, 1.78, and 1.11 lg Cd/l, respectively, based on R 0 = 53.89 -23.32 Log (Measured Cd) (R 2 = 0.96, P \ 0.01) of regression equation in this study, because the population growth rate has been proposed as a more relevant measurement of toxicant effects than traditional measures of mortality or reproduction in chemical risk assessment (Barata et al 2002a) and net reproductive rate was considered as the most sensitive end point of metal toxicity to M. monogolica .…”
Section: Notementioning
confidence: 69%