1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-078x(199910/12)14:4<223::aid-bin37>3.0.co;2-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of social validity trends in applied behavior analysis

Abstract: Research articles published during the first 31 years of Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis were assessed for reports of social validity measures. Two measures of social validity (treatment outcome and treatment acceptability) were assessed for each article. In addition, articles were assessed for the incorporation of analog versus naturalistic settings. Overall, treatment outcome and acceptability measures were reported in less than 13% of articles. In addition, studies conducted in naturalistic settings we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
53
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study highlights the importance of considering the social validity of behavioral treatments (Carr, Austin, Britton, Kellum, & Bailey, 1999). For Callie's caregiver, decorating for the holidays was an important family tradition in which the family had been unable to participate for several years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The current study highlights the importance of considering the social validity of behavioral treatments (Carr, Austin, Britton, Kellum, & Bailey, 1999). For Callie's caregiver, decorating for the holidays was an important family tradition in which the family had been unable to participate for several years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Social validity is not assessed and/or reported in research as frequently as recommended (Carr, Austin, Britton, Kellum, & Bailey, ). This study contributed to the literature by assessing social validity of a potentially invasive behavior‐analytic feeding intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McIntyre, Gresham, DiGennaro, and Reed () reviewed school‐based studies published in JABA between 1991 and 2005 with individuals ages 0–18 years, and the authors found that only 30% of the studies reported treatment integrity data. Articles published in JABA from 1968 to 1998 were also assessed for reports of social validity measures, and the authors found that less than 13% of articles reported treatment outcome and acceptability measures (Carr, Austin, Britton, Kellum, & Bailey, ). Assuming that other journals outside of behavior analysis are less familiar with procedural fidelity and social validity measurement in SCD research, the lack of these data in the current review was not particularly surprising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%