2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-021-01987-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of snow-glacier melt runoff under climate change scenarios in the Himalayan basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficient of determination (R 2 ) was found to be 0.85 and 0.87 respectively for calibration and validation, the NSE equalled to 0.85 in both runs, and Percent bias was -2.5 and -5.4 respectively, for those runs. Based on the values of R 2 , NSE and PBIAS from above table and performance rating criteria provided by (Moriasi et al, 2007), the model showed a reliable estimate even in daily time step for both calibration and validation as comparable to other studies (Singh et al, 2021a). The p-factor for both calibration and validation period were found to be 0.84, whereas the r-factor for those periods were 0.28 and 0.38 respectively, both within a quite good acceptable range (Singh et al, 2021a;Jain et al, 2017).…”
Section: **Insert Table 1 Here**supporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The coefficient of determination (R 2 ) was found to be 0.85 and 0.87 respectively for calibration and validation, the NSE equalled to 0.85 in both runs, and Percent bias was -2.5 and -5.4 respectively, for those runs. Based on the values of R 2 , NSE and PBIAS from above table and performance rating criteria provided by (Moriasi et al, 2007), the model showed a reliable estimate even in daily time step for both calibration and validation as comparable to other studies (Singh et al, 2021a). The p-factor for both calibration and validation period were found to be 0.84, whereas the r-factor for those periods were 0.28 and 0.38 respectively, both within a quite good acceptable range (Singh et al, 2021a;Jain et al, 2017).…”
Section: **Insert Table 1 Here**supporting
confidence: 77%
“…Nepal has realised as a national topmost and highly prioritised issue of water resources for the country prosperity and development (Chhetri et al, 2020;Sharma and Shakya, 2006). But the hydrology of the rivers in Himalayan basin is predicted to be more vulnerable because of the seasonal, latitudinal and altitudinal shifting of the freezing line due to the effects of the climate change (Singh et al, 2021a;Jones, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In many similar studies of high-altitude areas, river runoff is mainly fed by glacier meltwater, which is detected to increase due to increasing glacier melt [11,60,61]. The Pamir is a typical representative of the high-altitude headwater area.…”
Section: Runoff Characteristics Of High-altitude Headwatersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the response of meltwater to climate change varies dramatically in different geographic environments. In the Himalayas, glaciers are shrinking due to climate warming, but river runoff is increasing, and high and low altitudes are more sensitive to climate change than moderate elevation areas [11]. The rapid melting of glaciers has also been observed in Peru, causing a complex impact on upstream hydrology, and reveals a declining contribution of meltwater to the watershed outflows [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%