2012
DOI: 10.1520/gtj20120077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of Resilient Modulus Testing: Internal and External Deflection Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SRM ratio increases consistently with the SRM calculated from the internal LVDTs. This observation is similar to those by Sawangsuriya et al (19) and Camargo et al (20). An SRM computed from an internal LVDT is believed to provide better accuracy than an SRM computed from an external LVDT because displacement measured from an internal LVDT can eliminate the errors resulting from machine compliance and end (bedding) effects (20,21).…”
Section: Saturation and Soil Suction Initializationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The SRM ratio increases consistently with the SRM calculated from the internal LVDTs. This observation is similar to those by Sawangsuriya et al (19) and Camargo et al (20). An SRM computed from an internal LVDT is believed to provide better accuracy than an SRM computed from an external LVDT because displacement measured from an internal LVDT can eliminate the errors resulting from machine compliance and end (bedding) effects (20,21).…”
Section: Saturation and Soil Suction Initializationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Design agencies are moving to adopt M-EPDG, which requires the use of a modulus based on internal deflection measurements. Additionally, using internal LVDTs eliminates the error resulting from machine compliance and end effects (Camargo, Benson, & Edil, 2012;NCHRP, 2004). Therefore, M R obtained from deformations measured by the internal Downloaded by [University of Leeds] at 17:02 04 October 2015…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test conditions are also particularly important when testing the deformation of saturated samples [1]. The resilient modulus determined from the internal and external deflection measurements may differ significantly [21]. The difference is less than 50% for unbound materials and subgrade soils, but it is higher for stiff, stabilised materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%