1980
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(80)90215-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of recent advances in external maxillofacial materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
99
0
8

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
99
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of different studies suggest that none of the tested commercial materials fulfilled the above criteria [5,18,19]. The addition of fillers is necessary for achieving certain degree of reinforcement that leads to significant improvement of the mechanical properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of different studies suggest that none of the tested commercial materials fulfilled the above criteria [5,18,19]. The addition of fillers is necessary for achieving certain degree of reinforcement that leads to significant improvement of the mechanical properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of the use of colorants, adhesives, cosmetic agents, solvents, and cleaners that are applied to the prosthesis, marginal breakdown occurs. [6][7][8][9][10] The clinical life of adhesive-retained facial prosthesis averages about 6 months to 1 year before replacement is needed.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they are not without shortcomings 18) -amongst which are the tendency to induce fibrous tissue formation, absorb facial oils which can adversely impact prosthesis longevity 19) , and to provide a potential site for bacterial colonization. Nonetheless, with improved biocompatibility bestowed upon it by means of MPC polymer coating, silastic elastomers (SE) are well poised to be used in a wider range of medical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%