2010
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of histone-modification antibody quality

Abstract: We report testing of the specificity and utility of over 200 antibodies raised against 57 different histone modifications, in Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans and human cells. While most antibodies performed well, over 25% failed specificity tests by dot blot or western blot. Among specific antibodies, over 20% failed in chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments. We advise rigorous testing of histone-modification antibodies before use and provide a website for posting new test results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
348
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 375 publications
(358 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
348
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We obtained data from cells at two time points during male 63 germ cell development: prophase of meiosis I (pachytene spermatocytes), and following 64 completion of meiosis (round spermatids). These cell types are unique in that they can be 65 identified and reliably collected from whole testes in multiple mammalian species without the 66 use of transgenes or genetic markers (see Methods). In addition, they differ substantially from 67 each other in their place in the cell cycle and in the physical state of their chromatin: pachytenes 68 are tetraploid cells in meiotic prophase, with large nuclei and synapsed pairs of homologous 69 chromosomes, while round spermatids are haploid cells that have completed meiosis and have 70 small, compact nuclei.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained data from cells at two time points during male 63 germ cell development: prophase of meiosis I (pachytene spermatocytes), and following 64 completion of meiosis (round spermatids). These cell types are unique in that they can be 65 identified and reliably collected from whole testes in multiple mammalian species without the 66 use of transgenes or genetic markers (see Methods). In addition, they differ substantially from 67 each other in their place in the cell cycle and in the physical state of their chromatin: pachytenes 68 are tetraploid cells in meiotic prophase, with large nuclei and synapsed pairs of homologous 69 chromosomes, while round spermatids are haploid cells that have completed meiosis and have 70 small, compact nuclei.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antibodies used were HP1a W191, Abcam 1220 H3K9me2, and Millipore 07-030 H3K4me2. Antibodies were validated by us and by others: see the Antibody Validation Database (http://compbio.med.harvard.edu/antibodies/ about) (43). Quantitaive PCR (see Table S1 for the list of primers) was performed using Bio-Rad iQ SYBR Green Supermix in a Cepheid SmartCycler.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To inhibit RNA polymerase II, actinomycin D (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the medium at a concentration of 1 ÎŒg/ml for 4 h. To ensure the signal specificity of the primary antibodies, we have carefully selected the antibodies that have been validated previously on dot blots and western blots (anti-H4K5Ac, anti-H4K20me1, anti-H3K4me2, anti-H3K9me2, anti-H3K27me2 and anti-H3K36me3; data available at Antibody Validation Database, http://compbio.med.harvard.edu/antibodies/) (Egelhofer et al, 2011) or that have been successfully used for immunofluorescence by others. We have also performed western blots to further test the antibody specificity (Fig.…”
Section: Cell Line Inhibitors and Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%