2020
DOI: 10.12691/aees-8-6-18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of Artificial Neural Networks, Support Vector Machines and Decision Trees for Land Cover Classification Using Sentinel-2A Data

Abstract: Remotely sensed images serve as a valuable source of present and archival information since they provide the geographical distribution of natural and cultural features both spatially and temporally, as well as objects on the earth's surface. Three machine learning classifiers, namely artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and decision tree (DT) algorithms, were applied in order to classify the Sentinel-2A data over the city of Soran. The differences in classification accuracies were e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study covered the literature review about ANN classifier from previous studies as follow: (Mishra et al, 2017;Kadavi and Lee, 2018;Dibs et al, 2020;Dixit and Agarwal, 2020;Ekumah et al, 2020;Hamad, 2020;Kaya and Görgün, 2020;MohanRajan et al, 2020;Navin and Agilandeeswari, 2020;Rojas et al, 2020;Saddique et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2020;Angessa et al, 2021;Bhattacharya et al, 2021;Dede et al, 2021;Ghayour et al, 2021;Sang et al, 2021;Xie et al, 2021;Yusof et al, 2021;Ambinakudige and Intsiful, 2022;Fantinel et al, 2022;Gogumalla et al, 2022;Rizvon and Jayakumar, 2022;Theres and Selvakumar, 2022).…”
Section: Ann Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study covered the literature review about ANN classifier from previous studies as follow: (Mishra et al, 2017;Kadavi and Lee, 2018;Dibs et al, 2020;Dixit and Agarwal, 2020;Ekumah et al, 2020;Hamad, 2020;Kaya and Görgün, 2020;MohanRajan et al, 2020;Navin and Agilandeeswari, 2020;Rojas et al, 2020;Saddique et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2020;Angessa et al, 2021;Bhattacharya et al, 2021;Dede et al, 2021;Ghayour et al, 2021;Sang et al, 2021;Xie et al, 2021;Yusof et al, 2021;Ambinakudige and Intsiful, 2022;Fantinel et al, 2022;Gogumalla et al, 2022;Rizvon and Jayakumar, 2022;Theres and Selvakumar, 2022).…”
Section: Ann Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to SVM and Decision Trees, Artificial neural networks have given better results in many specific applications of LULC classification [99]. manual effort required in annotation and object extraction tasks.…”
Section: Image Classification Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shetty S (2019) [17] while analysing efficiency of classifiers for LULC using Random Forest, Support Vector Machine and Maximum likelihood classier applied on Google Earth Engine image found that random forest (RF) classifier to be the best with highest accuracy. R. Hamad (2020) [18] in his research paper, An assessment of Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Decision Tree (DT) for land cover classification using sentinel-2A data found that ANN is the best classifier with 90% accuracy followed by SVM with 65% and DT with 60%. Mahendra et al (2019) [19] used Landsat-3 image to find the efficient classifiers among Mahalanobis distance, Minimum distance, Maximum likelihood and SVM and fond that SVM as the best classifier with 95.35% accuracy with Kappa of 0.94.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%