41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2003
DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of Approximate Modeling of Aerodynamic Loads on the UAE Rotor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According the SWT-2.3-93 product brochure, 2 NACA63 series and FFA airfoils are used in the actual blade. We used members of those airfoil families in our turbine model, and the twodimensional lift and drag data were obtained from Bertagnolio et al 28 Using the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL) AirfoilPrep code, 29 the two-dimensional lift and drag data corresponding to stalled conditions were corrected for the fact that stall may be delayed on rotating blades using the methods of Du and Selig 30 and Eggers et al 31 AirfoilPrep was also used to apply Viterna and Janetzke's method 32 to extrapolate the data to a wider range of angles of attack. We also designed a simple torque controller similar to that of the NREL 5MW reference turbine model 33 that contains different control strategies for Regions 1, 1-1/2, 2, and 2-1/2.…”
Section: B Wind Plant Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According the SWT-2.3-93 product brochure, 2 NACA63 series and FFA airfoils are used in the actual blade. We used members of those airfoil families in our turbine model, and the twodimensional lift and drag data were obtained from Bertagnolio et al 28 Using the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL) AirfoilPrep code, 29 the two-dimensional lift and drag data corresponding to stalled conditions were corrected for the fact that stall may be delayed on rotating blades using the methods of Du and Selig 30 and Eggers et al 31 AirfoilPrep was also used to apply Viterna and Janetzke's method 32 to extrapolate the data to a wider range of angles of attack. We also designed a simple torque controller similar to that of the NREL 5MW reference turbine model 33 that contains different control strategies for Regions 1, 1-1/2, 2, and 2-1/2.…”
Section: B Wind Plant Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 To do this analysis, we use the airfoil design code RFOIL. 51,52 Then, the methods of Du and Selig 53 and Eggers et al 54 are used for the rotational stall delay. The drag coefficient is corrected using the method of Viterna and Janetzke.…”
Section: Aerodynamics and Structural Design Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have also found through the use of parked blade data that the blade geometry has an impact on 3D aerodynamic effects. 2,12,13,[27][28][29] Ronsten 30 compared rotating and non-rotating blade data and found pronounced increases in the lift coefficient at inboard blade sections for both operating states. Gonzalez and Munduate 13 examined parked and rotating blade data for the NREL Phase VI rotor 31 and observed that the parked blade showed leading-edge separation at inboard locations, which delayed the onset of stall but did not contribute to an increase in lift force.…”
Section: Blade Rotational Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some models have been developed empirically from experimental data, [34][35][36] while others are rooted in theoretical analyses. 7,17,18,27,[37][38][39][40][41] Most contemporary stall delay models share a similar methodology for the correction of the 2D lift and drag coefficients described as…”
Section: Contemporary Stall Delay Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%