2014
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2014.931927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment arms race and its fallout: high-stakes grading and the case for slow scholarship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some students mentioned that they would not have kept up with the coursework had the intermediate assessment not been there. Students in the paper by Harland et al (2015) also feared that they would not make effective use of independent study time and therefore appreciated frequent assessments to serve as a guide for studying.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some students mentioned that they would not have kept up with the coursework had the intermediate assessment not been there. Students in the paper by Harland et al (2015) also feared that they would not make effective use of independent study time and therefore appreciated frequent assessments to serve as a guide for studying.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, competition arose, with non-graded study activities losing out. Harland et al (2015) called this an "assessment arms race". The notion of an assessment arms race is backed up by findings from Vos (1992) who found that students in the Netherlands spent a maximum of seven hours on studying.…”
Section: Negative Effects Of Intermediate Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, if students are to be prepared for learning throughout life, they must learn to regulate their own learning as they progress through higher education. A programme-long portfolio, which students can shape and edit through the length of the programme, offers them a chance to take ownership of their learning over a period of time, creating a space for 'slow scholarship' (Harland et al 2015).…”
Section: Audiences and Partnersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This risks irritating students, so a tutor has to be confident that the learning gain is worth the trade-off or that students will eventually see the benefits. This pragmatic approach also goes against the principle that assessment supports learning more when it is low-stakes, with the risk that forcing students to engage can lead to an "arms race" of tutors competing against each other's modules for student attention (Harland et al 2015).…”
Section: Feedback In Academic Writing Support Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%