The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2015
DOI: 10.3846/20294913.2015.1056277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment approach for non-governmental organizations in humanitarian relief logistics and an application in Turkey

Abstract: Abstract. The ever-increasing natural disasters have been causing the loss of lives, properties and resources. By the preparedness and response ability of non-governmental organizations, it is aimed to minimize these losses. In this paper, first, the critical success factors of humanitarian relief logistics management operations are determined and categorized. Then, by considering these factors, a hybrid method that consists of trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy sets, AHP and TOPSIS, is proposed to evaluate eme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted above, because the business environment within which humanitarian supply chains operate changes, as a result of many factors, solving real-time problems with MCDM involves qualitative and quantitative factors with multiple objectives (Bhutta and Huq 2002;Çebi and Bayraktar 2003;Ramanathan 2007;Chai et al 2013). Recent studies acknowledge the importance of MCDM to explore issues related to humanitarian supply chains, however Gultjahr and Nolz (2016) highlight the difficulty of bringing such techniques closer to practical application (Celik et al 2014;Celik and Gumus 2015;Abidi et al 2015;Roh et al 2015;Ju et al 2015). MCDM can help practitioners to appreciate the trade-offs, priority factors, multiple conflicting goals and supplier strengths and weaknesses, thereby improving humanitarian supplier selection decisions (Wang et al 2009;Shaw et al 2012;Bozorgi-Amiri et al 2013).…”
Section: Partner Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted above, because the business environment within which humanitarian supply chains operate changes, as a result of many factors, solving real-time problems with MCDM involves qualitative and quantitative factors with multiple objectives (Bhutta and Huq 2002;Çebi and Bayraktar 2003;Ramanathan 2007;Chai et al 2013). Recent studies acknowledge the importance of MCDM to explore issues related to humanitarian supply chains, however Gultjahr and Nolz (2016) highlight the difficulty of bringing such techniques closer to practical application (Celik et al 2014;Celik and Gumus 2015;Abidi et al 2015;Roh et al 2015;Ju et al 2015). MCDM can help practitioners to appreciate the trade-offs, priority factors, multiple conflicting goals and supplier strengths and weaknesses, thereby improving humanitarian supplier selection decisions (Wang et al 2009;Shaw et al 2012;Bozorgi-Amiri et al 2013).…”
Section: Partner Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They conclude that the proposed method aims to obtain a road map of energy policies for Turkey. Celik and Gumus (2015) propose an assessment approach for evaluating of non-governmental relief organizations performance in Turkey.…”
Section: It2fahp+it2ftopsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, it has been used in a wide range of disciplines to overcome ambiguity in decision-makers ideas. A linguistic value can be represented by the approximate reasoning of fuzzy set numbers (Celik and Gumus, 2015). The linguistic values are utilized to transform decision makers' ideas or assessments into meaningful information.…”
Section: Fuzzy Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%