1974
DOI: 10.1139/z74-101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An artificial substrate for the quantitative comparison of the densities of larval simuliid (Diptera) populations

Abstract: 1974. An artificial substrate for the quantitative comparison of the densities of larval simuliid (Diptera) populations. Can. J. Zool. 52: 773-775.The use of a I0 X 10 cm, unglazed, ceramic, fireplace tiIe for the quantitative comparison of the population densities of immature simuliids in a variety or stream conditions throughout the year IS descrikd. Comparisons with other techniques described in the literature are given In vlew of the numerolls techniques reported, it is recommended that researchers in this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To collect associated entomofauna, six artificial substrata (fiberglass plates, 0.33 by 0.22 m each, with an internal lead ballast to prevent their dislodgement) had been placed as a chain, from one to the other margin of the river, into each sampling site 30 days previously. These artificial substrata are modified, more durable versions of the ceramic ones recommended by Lewis and Bennett (1974).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To collect associated entomofauna, six artificial substrata (fiberglass plates, 0.33 by 0.22 m each, with an internal lead ballast to prevent their dislodgement) had been placed as a chain, from one to the other margin of the river, into each sampling site 30 days previously. These artificial substrata are modified, more durable versions of the ceramic ones recommended by Lewis and Bennett (1974).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling of pre-imaginal blackflies using SASUs has been reviewed by Disney (1972) and . Lewis & Bennett (1974) The SASUs included io x io cm ceramic tiles (Zahar, 1951), heavy duty polythene sheets (5 x 2o cm), nylon fishing line (40-cm lengths) and natural substrates (Pandanus leaves, and wood) of standard area . The tiles were glazed on one side, but the larvae showed no preference for either surface and were collected from the glazed surface from which they could more easily be scraped .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unglazed tiles, proposed by Lewis & Bennett (1974) as a possible standard, are perhaps the most widely used. However, tiles are unsuitable for even short exposures in the shifting sand bottom streams of Nebraska and were found unsuitable by Boobar & Granett (1978) for some species that normally colonize only vegetation.…”
Section: Substrate Suitabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More valid is that time required to achieve densities per unit area of substrate the same as densities occurring on natural substrates (e.g., Lewis & Bennett 1974). However, where vegetation is the primary natural substrate not only are densities difficult to determine but different observed densities are just as likely because of local or temporal changes in the substrate.…”
Section: Optimum Colonization Timementioning
confidence: 99%