2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03532-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An artificial intelligence study: automatic description of anatomic landmarks on panoramic radiographs in the pediatric population

İrem Bağ,
Elif Bilgir,
İbrahim Şevki Bayrakdar
et al.

Abstract: Background Panoramic radiographs, in which anatomic landmarks can be observed, are used to detect cases closely related to pediatric dentistry. The purpose of the study is to investigate the success and reliability of the detection of maxillary and mandibular anatomic structures observed on panoramic radiographs in children using artificial intelligence. Methods A total of 981 mixed images of pediatric patients for 9 different pediatric anatomic la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their deep learning study, Bağ et al, developed YOLO-v5 models to automatically detect nine important anatomical structures in approximately one thousand panoramic radiographs of pediatric patients. The F1 score and sensitivity values for the labelled anatomical regions were 0.98–0.99 for maxillary sinus, 1–1 for orbit, 0.97–0.99 for mandibular canal, 0.88–0.92 for mental foramen, 0.95–0.95 for foramen mandibula, 0.99–0.99 for incisura mandibula, 0.92–0.92 for articular eminence, 0.94–0.99 for condylar, and 0.86–0.97 for coronoid [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In their deep learning study, Bağ et al, developed YOLO-v5 models to automatically detect nine important anatomical structures in approximately one thousand panoramic radiographs of pediatric patients. The F1 score and sensitivity values for the labelled anatomical regions were 0.98–0.99 for maxillary sinus, 1–1 for orbit, 0.97–0.99 for mandibular canal, 0.88–0.92 for mental foramen, 0.95–0.95 for foramen mandibula, 0.99–0.99 for incisura mandibula, 0.92–0.92 for articular eminence, 0.94–0.99 for condylar, and 0.86–0.97 for coronoid [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI has become increasingly popular in radiographic interpretation, including in dentomaxillofacial radiology. AI-based methods assist in image interpretation, providing faster data identification and improved diagnostic accuracy [ 7 ]. This is particularly beneficial in recognizing and managing dental and craniofacial conditions, while also eliminating errors associated with human fatigue [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%