2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10543-006-0091-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Arnoldi-type algorithm for computing page rank

Abstract: We consider the problem of computing PageRank. The matrix involved is large and cannot be factored, and hence techniques based on matrix-vector products must be applied. A variant of the restarted refined Arnoldi method is proposed, which does not involve Ritz value computations. Numerical examples illustrate the performance and convergence behavior of the algorithm. (2000): 65F15, 65C40. AMS subject classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
141
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the gap 1 − α ≈ 0.15 between the largest eigenvalue λ = 1 and other eigenvalues the PageRank algorithm permits an efficient and simple determination of the PageRank by the power iteration method [7]. It is also possible to use the powerful Arnoldi method [12][13][14] to compute efficiently the eigenspectrum λ i of the Google matrix: N N nA 2003 455 436 2 033 173 6000 2005 1 635 882 11 569 195 6000 2007 2 902 764 34 776 800 6000 2009 3 484 341 52 846 242 6000 200908 3 282 257 71 012 307 6000 2011 3 721 339 66 454 329 6000 The Arnoldi method allows to find a several thousands of eigenvalues λ i with maximal |λ| for a matrix size N as large as a few tens of millions [10,11,14,15]. Usually, at α = 1 the largest eigenvalue λ = 1 is highly degenerate [15] due to many invariant subspaces which define many independent Perron-Frobenius operators providing (at least) one eigenvalue λ = 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the gap 1 − α ≈ 0.15 between the largest eigenvalue λ = 1 and other eigenvalues the PageRank algorithm permits an efficient and simple determination of the PageRank by the power iteration method [7]. It is also possible to use the powerful Arnoldi method [12][13][14] to compute efficiently the eigenspectrum λ i of the Google matrix: N N nA 2003 455 436 2 033 173 6000 2005 1 635 882 11 569 195 6000 2007 2 902 764 34 776 800 6000 2009 3 484 341 52 846 242 6000 200908 3 282 257 71 012 307 6000 2011 3 721 339 66 454 329 6000 The Arnoldi method allows to find a several thousands of eigenvalues λ i with maximal |λ| for a matrix size N as large as a few tens of millions [10,11,14,15]. Usually, at α = 1 the largest eigenvalue λ = 1 is highly degenerate [15] due to many invariant subspaces which define many independent Perron-Frobenius operators providing (at least) one eigenvalue λ = 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many applications, α is given the value 0.85, but care must be taken to ensure that P α sufficiently resembles P [11]. For the balancing algorithm we are unable to prove a result as strong as Theorem 5.1.…”
Section: Practicalitiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The effectiveness of this ranking procedure is witnessed by the success of the search engine Google. Since the first investigations, various procedures and algorithms have been presented to determine the PageRank and its dynamical evolution [10,12,13,14]. It is fair to say that the study of PageRank constitutes a field of research on its own.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%