2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10790-008-9099-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Aristotelian Account of Autonomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One way of addressing the issue of limiting or trying to alter people's unhealthy choices has been to raise doubts about the idea of liberty and, in particular, the notion of autonomy, or self-rule (Allmark 2008;Cheung and Yam 2005;Dworkin 1988;Lindley 1986;May 1994;Mcknight 1993;O'Neill 2001). Some people's self-harming decisions can be badly informed; Mill finds it acceptable to, for example, prevent someone from taking a route that he does not know is dangerous because a bridge might collapse.…”
Section: Autonomy and Positive And Negative Libertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way of addressing the issue of limiting or trying to alter people's unhealthy choices has been to raise doubts about the idea of liberty and, in particular, the notion of autonomy, or self-rule (Allmark 2008;Cheung and Yam 2005;Dworkin 1988;Lindley 1986;May 1994;Mcknight 1993;O'Neill 2001). Some people's self-harming decisions can be badly informed; Mill finds it acceptable to, for example, prevent someone from taking a route that he does not know is dangerous because a bridge might collapse.…”
Section: Autonomy and Positive And Negative Libertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workaday application of autonomy in health care understood minimally as a commitment to informed consent belies the complexity of the various conceptions (Oshana, 1998; Coggon, 2007). Allmark (2008, p. 41) defines individual autonomy as ‘the capacity of the individual to make and act upon judgments for which he is held morally accountable.’ If this is the case, the result of the equivalence of autonomy and accountability (or responsibility) could reasonably be expected to conclude that if a patient is considered to be sufficiently autonomous to be allowed to buy cream cakes, or to consent to weight reduction medication or surgery, then he is also sufficiently autonomous so as to be liable to be held responsible for his/her eating and the obesity which follows, regardless of the multiple factors which influence eating behaviour, recognized by the UK government in its foresight report (Butland et al ., 2007).…”
Section: Applying the Framework To Health Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seperti yang disebutkan sebelumnya bahwa kebebasan yang dimiliki individu menunjukkan suatu otonomi individu terhadap diri dan kehidupannya. Meski demikian kebebasan yang dimiliki individu tetaplah harus dipertanggungjawabkan-sejalan dengan pendapatAllmark (2008) yang menyebutkan jika otonomi yang dimiliki individu mensyaratkannya untuk bertanggung jawab secara moral atas suatu tindakannya sebagai individu otonom. Allmark menambahkan ketika individu bertindak secara otonom, besar kemungkinan juga bahwa ini akan menjadi kondisi yang cukup untuk membuatnya bertanggung jawab secara moral.…”
unclassified