2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10670-010-9252-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Argument for the Existence of Tropes

Abstract: That there could be ontologically complex concrete particulars is selfevidently true. A reductio may however be formulated which contradicts this truth. In this paper I argue that all of the reasonable ways in which we might refute this reductio will require the existence of at least some tropes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“… Some would go as far as to say that no Bradleyan problem arises for (U″). To solve the problem for (U′) by replacing it with (U″) (as arguably proposed by Armstrong at one point (2005, 2006), and criticized by Maurin (2011) is however not recommended. Especially not if Gaskin (2008: esp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Some would go as far as to say that no Bradleyan problem arises for (U″). To solve the problem for (U′) by replacing it with (U″) (as arguably proposed by Armstrong at one point (2005, 2006), and criticized by Maurin (2011) is however not recommended. Especially not if Gaskin (2008: esp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bradley's argument has been much discussed in the literature. More recent contributions include e.g.,Allard (2005);Cameron (2008); Mander (1994);Maurin (2010Maurin ( , 2011Schnieder (2004);Stock (1998);Vallicella (2002);Wieland & Betti (2008).3 For more discussion of this (slightly cryptic) part ofBradley's argument cf. also, Baxter (1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I do not believe (following authors like Maurin 2010Maurin , 2011Schneider 2013;Simons 1994) that such responses easily allow refuting BR. First, the regress seems to be vicious because it is a regress of explanation: an initial explanation introduces elements that generate a need for an additional explanation ad infinitum.…”
Section: Bradley's Regress and Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some examples and discussions of the positives and negatives of the many variants see, inter alia, Barker and Jago (2018), Campbell (1990), Casullo (1984Casullo ( , 1988, , Hakkarainen and Keinänen (2017), Jago (2018), Maurin (2002Maurin ( , 2011, O'Leary- Hawthorne (1995), Paul (2017), Robb (2005), Simons (1994Simons ( , 1998, Ujvári (2013), and Wayne (2008). Furthermore, having instances means that types are universals.…”
Section: The Substance Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%