2009
DOI: 10.7557/12.218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An argument for phrasal spell-out: Indefinites and interrogatives in Spanish

Abstract: In this article we will provide evidence in favour of Phrasal Spell Out (PSO), a procedure of lexical insertion where non-terminal nodes in a tree configuration can be targeted by spell-out. We will propose that the formal differences between two Spanish indefinite pronouns, alguien and alguno, can be captured if the morpheme -ien is analyzed as a lexical item which corresponds to a syntactic phrase; this phrase, crucially, is broken in the presence of a plural number projection. Independent properties of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Caha 2009, Fábregas 2009b) no son necesarios procedimientos adicionales para capturar esto. Si el léxico encuentra una configuración como (76) y tiene en su elenco de entradas una que corresponde a (77), se produce la inserción sin necesidad de alterar la estructura sintáctica.…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified
“…Caha 2009, Fábregas 2009b) no son necesarios procedimientos adicionales para capturar esto. Si el léxico encuentra una configuración como (76) y tiene en su elenco de entradas una que corresponde a (77), se produce la inserción sin necesidad de alterar la estructura sintáctica.…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified
“…The late insertion approach of Distributed Morphology (Halle & Marantz 1993 and much related work) was a step forward, and so was the insight of nanosyntax (see Fábregas 2009;Starke 2011) that E-lexical items may represent or express larger structures than just terminal nodes. However, even though it seems possible to build on and develop these ideas, 46 the question of how syntactic structures get reinterpreted as phonetic expressions or as visual or tactile shape formations remains a largely unresolved puzzle.…”
Section:  Concluding Remarks: Some Further Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an OEPV, which -as we will see -involves an additional level of verbal structure, this could be handled by traditional P-incorporation to the highest verbal head, but this solution would not work in the case of SEPVs on the standard assumption that incorporation always targets higher nodes. We would like to suggest that a Phrasal Spell Out approach (Weerman and EversVermeul 2002, Neeleman and Szendröi 2007, Caha 2009, Fábregas 2009 could capture the facts. In this approach, exponents can lexicalise complex syntactic constituents provided they form syntactic constituents.…”
Section: Deriving Il and Sl From The Syntactic Structure Of Psychologmentioning
confidence: 99%