Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications
DOI: 10.1007/1-84628-152-0_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Architecture for Semantic Enterprise Application Integration Standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing approaches to dynamic or semantic B2B integration such as [1], [4], [6] are mostly conceptual with lack of demonstration and evaluation of real-world case scenarios. The system presented here has been implemented according to the scenario from the SWS Challenge 4 addressing data and process heterogeneities in a B2B integration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing approaches to dynamic or semantic B2B integration such as [1], [4], [6] are mostly conceptual with lack of demonstration and evaluation of real-world case scenarios. The system presented here has been implemented according to the scenario from the SWS Challenge 4 addressing data and process heterogeneities in a B2B integration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anicic et al (2006) propose a methodology for Semantic Enterprise Application Integration Standards, which utilises Semantic Web technologies for achieving interoperability between two business document standards -STAR and AIAG -both of which are based on the Open Applications Group Integration Specification (OAGIS) standard. Their methodology requires developing ontologies for each standard in the first place, which is done by using automated tools in this project.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, it is very costly for experts to identify the reusable standard components that can be shared by other schemas and to understand how to use them. As a result, users often end up creating new standard components or customizing a standard by adding new, typically duplicating or overlapping components rather than attempting to reuse existing ones [6,7]. This phenomenon also occurs in large organizations where multiple groups concurrently make SBD specifications (we witness this in the AIAG consortium).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%