Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - 1998
DOI: 10.3115/980691.980700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An architecture for dialogue management, context tracking, and pragmatic adaptation in spoken dialogue systems

Abstract: This paper details a software architecture for discourse processing in spoken dialogue systems, where the three component tasks of discourse processing are (1) Dialogue Management, (2) Context Tracking, and (3) Pragmatic Adaptation. We define these three component tasks and describe their roles in a complex, near-future scenario in which multiple humans interact with each other and with computers in multiple, simultaneous dialogue exchanges. This paper reports on the software modules that accomplish the three … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea of Activity Modelling in our system is the vision that dialogue systems can, in generality, be built for 'devices' which carry out certain well- ), and that an important part of the dialogue context to be modelled in such a system is the device's planned activities, current activities, and their execution status 5 . We choose to focus on building this class of dialogue systems because we share with (Allen et al, 2001), a version of the the Practical Dialogue 5 Compare this with the motivation behind the "Pragmatic Adapter" idea of (LuperFoy et al, 1998).…”
Section: Activity Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of Activity Modelling in our system is the vision that dialogue systems can, in generality, be built for 'devices' which carry out certain well- ), and that an important part of the dialogue context to be modelled in such a system is the device's planned activities, current activities, and their execution status 5 . We choose to focus on building this class of dialogue systems because we share with (Allen et al, 2001), a version of the the Practical Dialogue 5 Compare this with the motivation behind the "Pragmatic Adapter" idea of (LuperFoy et al, 1998).…”
Section: Activity Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%