2011
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2010.2085871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Architecture for a Dependable Distributed Sensor System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensor dependability, in turn, is a function of their ability to provide accurate measurements, to be resistant to environmental factors and events, and to properly transmit these measurements [69]. Currently, only limited research has been devoted to smart sensor architectures that incorporate fault detection and isolation [20,77], thus present sensor deployments may have only moderate dependability. Dependability may also be threatened because sensors cannot be equipped with a direct, permanent source of power [61].…”
Section: Sensor Dependabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensor dependability, in turn, is a function of their ability to provide accurate measurements, to be resistant to environmental factors and events, and to properly transmit these measurements [69]. Currently, only limited research has been devoted to smart sensor architectures that incorporate fault detection and isolation [20,77], thus present sensor deployments may have only moderate dependability. Dependability may also be threatened because sensors cannot be equipped with a direct, permanent source of power [61].…”
Section: Sensor Dependabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches comparable to ours are the sensor fusion architectures proposed by Elmenreich [5], Hightower et al [6] and Zug et al [7]. Elmenreich's approach was developed in the context of the Time-Triggered Architecture [8] and does not take jitter into account.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In KARYON we performed a failure mode analysis for different sensors and identified several fault modes that were categorized along five main dimensions: delay faults, sporadic offset faults, permanent offset faults, stochastic offset faults and stuck-at faults. The details of these results are provided in [42].…”
Section: A Failure Semantics In Sensor-based Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%