An Architecture Description Language for Mobile Distributed Systems

Gruhn, Volker; Schäfer, Clemens

doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24769-2_17

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The ADLs chosen for the comparison are: Darwin [9], C2Sadel [11], Community [8], MobiS [5], LAM Model [17], π-ADL [13], Con-Moto [7] and Ambient-PRISMA [1]. These ADLs have been chosen because they were the only ones found in the state of art which have declared to support primitives for distributed and mobile software systems.…”

Section: Comparing Adls For Distribution and Mobilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparing architecture description languages for mobile software systems

Alí

Solís

Ramos

2008

Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Architectures and Mobility

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Software architecture is a technique which aids the development of complex and dynamic systems. Architecture Description Languages (ADLs) describe software architectures using a textual syntax or a graphical notation. However, not many ADLs have provided primitives for describing software architectures of distributed and mobile software systems. This paper presents a comparison among existing ADLs that have addressed distributed and mobile software systems. The features chosen for the comparison have been taken from the work of Roman et al. [15] which propose a framework for viewing mobility. The features taken into account in this work are how ADLs support the notion of location, mobility, coordination, middleware, a graphical notation, and tools. The work presented in this paper proposes to be a starting point for discovering whether ADLs have properly supported mobility or not

show abstract

Section: Comparing Adls For Distribution and Mobilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This paper presents a comparison among existing ADLs which have described distributed and mobile systems. These are Darwin [9], C2Sadel [11], Community [8], MobiS [5], LAM Model [17], π-ADL [13], Con-Moto [7] and Ambient-PRISMA [1]. The main features used for the comparison have been proposed by Roman et al [15].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing architecture description languages for mobile software systems

Alí

Solís

Ramos

2008

Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Architectures and Mobility

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Code, which is generated from MAIDL, is in a procedural paradigm rather than declarative [1], since the control part mainly consists of procedures that are passing parameters and synchronizing processes in the mashup runtime environment. For this reason, we proposed automatic code generation algorithms, which assist composers in creating mobile mashup applications.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applications of Mobile Application Interface Description Language MAIDL

Chaisatien

Prutsachainimmit

Tokuda

2012

Current Trends in Web Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Developments of mobile mashup applications have a rapid growth in the recent years. We present a development of Mobile Application Interface Description Language (MAIDL) and its applications. The language enables the development of mobile mashup applications with less programming efforts. Using our description language, composers are able to reuse existent mobile applications, Web services, and Web applications as the components to create a mashup mobile application or a Tethered Web service on a mobile device (TeWS). We demonstrate the further application of a TeWS to deliver a cooperative mashup via a functionality exchange between an Android and an iOS device.

show abstract

Architecture Description for Mobile Distributed Systems

Gruhn¹,

Schäfer²

2005

Software Architecture

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. In this paper we motivate an Architecture Description Language (ADL) for mobile distributed systems based on the π-calculus. Different from other approaches, the non-functional properties, which are essential when mobile architectures are described, are treated in a flexible manner by inserting logical formulae for expressing and checking non-functional properties into π-calculus processes. A formal example is given to illustrate the approach before the constituents of the ADL are sketched.

show abstract

An Architecture Description Language for Mobile Distributed Systems

Cited by 7 publications

References 11 publications

Comparing architecture description languages for mobile software systems

Comparing architecture description languages for mobile software systems

Applications of Mobile Application Interface Description Language MAIDL

Architecture Description for Mobile Distributed Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About