An architectural framework for roadmapping: Towards visual strategy

Phaal, Robert; Müller, Gerrit

doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.018

Cited by 252 publications

(203 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

197

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Its emphasis shifts from the roadmap as a graphical product for the developing process of the roadmap [29]. In terms of the organization, communication work during the roadmapping process is usually a more important output than the final roadmap [26,27].…”

Section: Methodological Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Regional Open Innovation Roadmapping: A New Framework for Innovation-Based Regional Development

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:To foster sustainable regional development, many regions rely on innovations. To safeguard the generation of innovations and their market introduction, companies have increasingly used technology roadmapping and open innovation. The project INNOrural (Innovations for sustainable rural development) expanded these concepts by applying them to regions. This led to the rise of the "Regional Open Innovation Roadmapping" framework for innovation-based regional development (ROIR). This framework was tested by conducting two innovation roadmapping processes in the model region of Märkisch-Oderland (MOL), Germany: the certification of regional wood fuel and the establishment of a competence center for precision farming technology. Both innovation ideas were selected during the roadmapping process by applying a sustainability assessment. After 12 months, two complete roadmaps were ready for implementation. Key principles of ROIR were identified, including the use of a clear and replicable sustainability assessment method, the involvement of all relevant stakeholder groups in the early process and the cooperation between regional and subject experts. Generally, the broader adaptation of ROIR for additional regions will be useful. Nevertheless, the ROIR processes need to be evaluated in depth to develop a better understanding and to provide evidence of the benefits and limitations of this approach. OPEN ACCESSSustainability 2015, 7 2302

show abstract

Section: Methodological Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[23]. Even though it is frequently used by a broad spectrum of firms and business sectors, the research in this field is relatively sparse [26]. Furthermore, it has not been widely applied to geographical issues and regional sustainability.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Regional Open Innovation Roadmapping: A New Framework for Innovation-Based Regional Development

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The final phase of the foresight process involved the elaboration of operational plan for the implementation of the preferred R&D scenario with the use of technology roadmapping method (Phaal, Muller 2009). The plan in the form of a technology roadmap was developed during workshops by a group of internal experts supervised by the institute's foresight methodology team.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corporate foresight at the strategic research institutes

Sacio-Szymańska

Mazurkiewicz

Poteralska

2015

Business: Theory and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

help them improve their efficiency and build (or strengthen) their global competitiveness considering the turbulent envi ronment in which they operate. Whereas, the institutes could use foresight to set priorities of strategic research, which cor respond to national and international trends of S&T devel opment, and most importantly: to set operational, business oriented priority directions of development.As there is a wide array of qualitative and quantitative research methods, which can be used equally and in paral lel to arrive at the planned foresight results, the successful implementation of foresight processes, both at the macro, and micro levels depends, among others, on the applied methodology.The paper concentrates on corporate foresight imple mented by research institutes in order to anticipate their own development. Due to the following three reasons:− The specific role of research institutes in national innovation systems (discussed further in the paper), Abstract. Foresight -that is systematic, in depth analyses of social, technological, economic, environmental and political development trends in order to anticipate their impact on organisation, sector or a region in a long term perspectivesupports taking effective strategic and operational decisions at different organisational levels and thus shapes a country's economic development. The paper gives an overview of the corporate foresight process realised at the Institute for Sustainable Technologies -National Research Institute (Radom, Poland) based on an original technology foresight model, which takes into account the results from national and sectoral foresight processes in order to generate and prioritise future research priorities and technologies of the institute. The paper gives evidence of the practical implementation of the institute's cor porate foresight scientific outcomes into the national R&D agenda through the launch of the strategic research programme "Innovative Systems of Technical Support for Sustainable Development of Economy". CORPORATE FORESIGHT AT THE STRATEGIC RESEARCH INSTITUTES

show abstract

“…Nelson Sekitoleko [9] found that improved knowledge sharing between technical and managerial staff on different levels can significantly improve the ability to create a good plan that considers interdependencies between features and addresses both business and technical challenges. Robert Phaal and Gerrit Muller [10] discussed the value of having what they called "Linked analysis grids" that is used in directly linking business requirements with technological aspects of these requirements, then use a scoring technique that ranks product's backlog according to technical priority and complexity. Wojciech and Dorota [11] investigated the inherent risks in different agile methodologies, and concluded that a special risk mitigation process is mandatory.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%