2019
DOI: 10.7554/elife.48779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An arbitrary-spectrum spatial visual stimulator for vision research

Abstract: Visual neuroscientists require accurate control of visual stimulation. However, few stimulator solutions simultaneously offer high spatio-temporal resolution and free control over the spectra of the light sources, because they rely on off-the-shelf technology developed for human trichromatic vision. Importantly, consumer displays fail to drive UV-shifted short wavelength-sensitive photoreceptors, which strongly contribute to visual behaviour in many animals, including mice, zebrafish and fruit flies. Moreover,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In parallel, it is important to consider the specific absorption spectrum of the zebrafish UV-opsin relative to the spectrum of any illuminating light. For safety reasons, commercially available TFT monitors (Franke et al, 2019), projectors and organic-LED (OLED) screens used in behavioural experiments tend to restrict short wavelengths to <1% signal power below 420 nm. In contrast, zebrafish UV-opsin absorption peaks at 365 nm (Chinen et al, 2003;Robinson et al, 1993), meaning that the shortwavelength signal of most of these light sources will activate the UV-opsin with <1% efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, it is important to consider the specific absorption spectrum of the zebrafish UV-opsin relative to the spectrum of any illuminating light. For safety reasons, commercially available TFT monitors (Franke et al, 2019), projectors and organic-LED (OLED) screens used in behavioural experiments tend to restrict short wavelengths to <1% signal power below 420 nm. In contrast, zebrafish UV-opsin absorption peaks at 365 nm (Chinen et al, 2003;Robinson et al, 1993), meaning that the shortwavelength signal of most of these light sources will activate the UV-opsin with <1% efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these major gaps in knowledge, we systematically imaged light-driven signals from RGCs directly in the in vivo eye. By 'bending' the imaging scan-plane to follow the natural curvature of the live eye (Janiak et al, 2019), and synchronising the stimulation light with the scanner retrace (Baden et al, 2013;Euler et al, 2019;Franke et al, 2019;Zimmermann et al, 2018), we chart the in vivo functional diversity of larval zebrafish RGCs in time and wavelength across visual space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technology) was focused through the objective lens of the microscope 22,30 . Instead of standard RGB light-emitting diodes (LEDs), it was fitted with a green (576 nm) and a UV (390 nm) LED for matching the spectral sensitivity of mouse M-and S-opsins 31,32 .…”
Section: Light Stimulation a Modified Lightcrafter (Dlplcr4500 Texamentioning
confidence: 99%