Abstract:An approximation theorem for V-topologies on not necessarily commutative rings is proved. This holds for a certain class of rings (called rings with enough units) and a certain class of V-topologies (called coarse V-topologies). This has application, for example, to V-topologies induced by orderings.
“…An approximation theorem for V-topologies on rings is proven in [Ma2]. As in the field and skew field cases we can apply this to the valuations we have constructed which correspond to our dependency classes.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…and let τ i be the (archimedean) V-topology induced byP i . By remarks in [Ma2], each of these V-topologies is coarse. Also, they are all distinct: In the nonarchimedean case this follows from the independence of the v i 's.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By the remarks above on the V-topologies (R i , α i , τ i ), we can apply [Ma2,2.3] to our situation if we show that for each i, S * i is a τ i -neighborhood of 1. Given P ∈ O S i , let P = α −1 i (P ), i.e., P = (p i ,P ) ∈ O T .…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definition. Following [Ma2], we define a V-topology on R to be a triple (F, α, τ ) where F is a field, α : R → F a ring homomorphism such that F is the field of fractions of α(R), and τ a V-topology on F . For details, see [Ma2].…”
“…An approximation theorem for V-topologies on rings is proven in [Ma2]. As in the field and skew field cases we can apply this to the valuations we have constructed which correspond to our dependency classes.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…and let τ i be the (archimedean) V-topology induced byP i . By remarks in [Ma2], each of these V-topologies is coarse. Also, they are all distinct: In the nonarchimedean case this follows from the independence of the v i 's.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By the remarks above on the V-topologies (R i , α i , τ i ), we can apply [Ma2,2.3] to our situation if we show that for each i, S * i is a τ i -neighborhood of 1. Given P ∈ O S i , let P = α −1 i (P ), i.e., P = (p i ,P ) ∈ O T .…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definition. Following [Ma2], we define a V-topology on R to be a triple (F, α, τ ) where F is a field, α : R → F a ring homomorphism such that F is the field of fractions of α(R), and τ a V-topology on F . For details, see [Ma2].…”
In the last two decades new techniques emerged to construct valuations on an infinite division ring D, given a normal subgroup N ⊆ D × of finite index. These techniques were based on the commuting graph of D × /N in the case where D is non-commutative, and on the Milnor K-graph on D × /N, in the case where D is commutative. In this paper we unify these two approaches and consider V-graphs on D × /N and how they lead to valuations. We furthermore generalize previous results to situations of finitely many valuations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.