2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.13.456221
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approximate stochastic optimal control framework to simulate nonlinear neuro-musculoskeletal models in the presence of noise

Abstract: Optimal control simulations have shown that both musculoskeletal dynamics and physiological noise are important determinants of movement. However, due to the limited efficiency of available computational tools, deterministic simulations of movement focus on accurately modelling the musculoskeletal system while neglecting physiological noise, and stochastic simulations account for noise while simplifying the dynamics. We took advantage of recent approaches where stochastic optimal control problems are approxima… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A high exponent in the performance criterion increased co-activation ( Supplementary Figure S1 ) but resulted in excitation estimates that agreed poorly for all models and scaling variants ( Figures 3 , 5 ). Modeling approaches in which MTU controls are solved by minimizing muscle effort and including feedforward and feedback control to account for sensory and motor noise ( Van Wouwe et al, 2022 ) or by regulating mechanical impedance at the joints ( Shourijeh and Fregly, 2020 ), better represent intrinsic motor coordination characteristics; these approaches are more likely to better estimate co-activation than minimizing muscle effort with a high exponent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high exponent in the performance criterion increased co-activation ( Supplementary Figure S1 ) but resulted in excitation estimates that agreed poorly for all models and scaling variants ( Figures 3 , 5 ). Modeling approaches in which MTU controls are solved by minimizing muscle effort and including feedforward and feedback control to account for sensory and motor noise ( Van Wouwe et al, 2022 ) or by regulating mechanical impedance at the joints ( Shourijeh and Fregly, 2020 ), better represent intrinsic motor coordination characteristics; these approaches are more likely to better estimate co-activation than minimizing muscle effort with a high exponent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our model, mechanical impedance originates from the force-length-velocity relationship in the virtual Hill-type muscle ( 31 ). Mechanical impedance has been shown to be important to reduce the need for active control through delayed feedback ( 30 , 32 , 33 ). However, mechanical impedance and local reflexes alone cannot explain observed changes in ankle torque after perturbations (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the personalised MSK model can be obtained through the direct collocation (DC) method. The DC method becomes a powerful approach paired with MSK models for predictive simulation [25], human movement analysing [26], and prosthesis control [27]. Falisse et al employed the direct collocation method to estimate the subject-specific parameters for a lower limb MSK model which results in a short optimisation time and 30% improvement of the estimation performance, compared with the linear scaled method [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%