2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-020-09718-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Appropriate Way to Extend the Banzhaf Index for Multiple Levels of Approval

Abstract: The Banzhaf power index for games admits several extensions if the players have more than two ordered voting options. In this paper we prove that the most intuitive and recognized extension of the index fails to preserve the desirability relation for games with more than three ordered input levels of approval, a failure that undermines the index to be a good measure of power. This leads us to think of an alternative to the Banzhaf index for several input levels of approval. We propose a candidate for which it … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the further developments is following the ideas of Freixas (2005aFreixas ( , 2005bFreixas ( , 2012Freixas ( , 2020 and Freixas and Pons (2021) and provide an extension of the PHI θ index for games with several levels of approval, for example. The next idea is a modification of θ to simple games with the known probability distribution over coalitions and then study the properties of the obtained index, see Freixas and Pons (2017), for example.…”
Section: Proof Let Us Consider Three Simple Games Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the further developments is following the ideas of Freixas (2005aFreixas ( , 2005bFreixas ( , 2012Freixas ( , 2020 and Freixas and Pons (2021) and provide an extension of the PHI θ index for games with several levels of approval, for example. The next idea is a modification of θ to simple games with the known probability distribution over coalitions and then study the properties of the obtained index, see Freixas and Pons (2017), for example.…”
Section: Proof Let Us Consider Three Simple Games Vmentioning
confidence: 99%