2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An appropriate stiffness degradation parameter to monitor fatigue damage evolution in composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three main points include the following: (1) At the early stage of fatigue, the degradation rate of residual stiffness is relatively lower under the high-stress level, while it is higher under the low-stress level, at the final stage of the fatigue, the degradation rate of residual stiffness is relatively higher under the high-stress level, while it is lower under the low-stress level; (2) The higher the stress level is, the more serious the stiffness decreases, conversely, the lower the stress level is, the less serious the stiffness decreases; (3) the stiffness degradation law of GFRP laminates does not show a fast-slow-fast characteristic, which can be found from Refs. 35,36 as well.…”
Section: Parameter Calculation Of Stiffness Degradation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three main points include the following: (1) At the early stage of fatigue, the degradation rate of residual stiffness is relatively lower under the high-stress level, while it is higher under the low-stress level, at the final stage of the fatigue, the degradation rate of residual stiffness is relatively higher under the high-stress level, while it is lower under the low-stress level; (2) The higher the stress level is, the more serious the stiffness decreases, conversely, the lower the stress level is, the less serious the stiffness decreases; (3) the stiffness degradation law of GFRP laminates does not show a fast-slow-fast characteristic, which can be found from Refs. 35,36 as well.…”
Section: Parameter Calculation Of Stiffness Degradation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and numerical work by Kawai et al [19] on unidirectional off-axis laminates. Also, a number of authors reported the tendency of woven specimens to fail close to the grips due to the presence of a complex stress state [1,19,41].…”
Section: Failure Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was interesting to note that specimens did not fail after delamination, and the separated plies continued to carry the load. Additionally, experiments performed by Tang et al [41] showed that longitudinal stiffness of cross-ply laminates is almost insensitive to the onset and growth of delamination. In the case of the 28° braid angle, specimens fractured perpendicular to the load direction and formed a zig-zag pattern on the surface (Figure 7a).…”
Section: Failure Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, residual stiffness and strength are frequently used to define damage parameters. Nevertheless, residual strength cannot be evaluated by non-destructive techniques, whereas residual stiffness can be monitored non-destructively and even in real-time during service life [13,37,38]. Therefore, stiffness degradation is a preferable parameter to characterize damage development in a component under cyclic loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%