2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach to the intercalibration of benthic ecological status assessment in the North Atlantic ecoregion, according to the European Water Framework Directive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
101
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although present assessment methods are limited in the guidance they can provide to man agers, development of multistressor assessment methods, albeit needed, will be complex and most effective if developed at the local level. However, a major issue is determining meth ods that are accurate and acceptable on a large-scale basis that can then be applied at a smaller scale (and need to be intercalibrated; Borja et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although present assessment methods are limited in the guidance they can provide to man agers, development of multistressor assessment methods, albeit needed, will be complex and most effective if developed at the local level. However, a major issue is determining meth ods that are accurate and acceptable on a large-scale basis that can then be applied at a smaller scale (and need to be intercalibrated; Borja et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, speciesabundance-biomass (SAB) curves (Pearson and Rosenberg, 1978), abundance-biomass comparisons (ABCs, Warwick, 1986), AMBI (Borja et al, 2000), and diversity indices. (e.g., Rosenberg et al, 2004;Borja et al, 2007). Given the estuarine quality paradox (see this concept in the next section), however, the main problem is that some of these methods detect naturally as well as anthropogenically stressed areas, thus decreasing the ability of detecting and maximizing the signal (anthropogenic change)-to-noise (natural change) ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its structure can be used to select indicators as is being done in the implementation of e.g. European Water Framework Directive [15][16][17]. Moreover it can be a very effective tool to organize participation processes to better involve stakeholders, managers and scientists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DPSIR scheme of indicators is a flexible framework that can be adapted to the necessities of specific programmes to stress the different indicator types. It has been widely used for different purposes, for the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive [15][16][17], coastal zone studies [10,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] and in fisheries management [14]. This methodology works well at simplifying the complexity of environmental management and makes easier communication among policy makers, scientists and the general public, improving the cooperation among them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enables the susceptibility of waters to respond to high nutrient inputs, identified by Painting et al (2007), and linked to light availability and water residence times, to be taken into consideration. Similar indices are being developed with respect to a range of parameters that may be affected by excessive nutrient inputs including benthos and attached macroalgae (Borja et al, 2007;Wilkinson et al, 2007).…”
Section: Nutrient Enrichment and The Occurrence Of Eutrophic Conditiomentioning
confidence: 99%