[1992] Proceedings 29th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
DOI: 10.1109/dac.1992.227769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach to symbolic timing verification

Abstract: Symbolic timing verification is a powerfur extension to traditional constraint checking that allows delays and constraints to be expressed as symbolic variables. In this paper, we present an approach to symbolic timing verification using constraint logic programming techniques. The techniques are quire powerful in that they yield not only simple bounds on delays but also relate the delays in linear inequalities so that tradeoffs are apparent. We model circuits as communicating processes and our current impleme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An application of constraint logic programming over rational numbers, CLP( ), has been studied in Amon and Boriello [1992]. The authors use the constraint programming approach for symbolic timing verification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An application of constraint logic programming over rational numbers, CLP( ), has been studied in Amon and Boriello [1992]. The authors use the constraint programming approach for symbolic timing verification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Path tracing has been combined with state transition graph (STG) analysis [12] for a specific class of designs -CPUs partitioned 1 In contrast, STGs of gate or register transfer level circuits are too large to be represented explicitly and/or take too much time to be built.…”
Section: A Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transformation on OEgraphs [1] which model behavior and timing together is applicable to a general class of designs. However, the transformation rules are adhoc and do not adequately handle the large degree of concurrency encountered for a large number of components.…”
Section: No Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations