Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3373718.3394776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approach to Regular Separability in Vector Addition Systems

Abstract: We study the problem of regular separability of languages of vector addition systems with states (VASS). It asks whether for two given VASS languages K and L, there exists a regular language R that includes K and is disjoint from L. While decidability of the problem in full generality remains an open question, there are several subclasses for which decidability has been shown: It is decidable for (i) one-dimensional VASS, (ii) VASS coverability languages, (iii) languages of integer VASS, and (iv) commutative V… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For showing decidability of regular separability, we use the following well-known fact (please see Appendix D for a proof). The last ingredient for our decision procedure is the following simple but powerful observation from [14] (for the convenience of the reader, a proof can be found in Appendix E). Lemma 5.7.…”
Section: Lemma 53 ([20]) Inf(h) Is Decidablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For showing decidability of regular separability, we use the following well-known fact (please see Appendix D for a proof). The last ingredient for our decision procedure is the following simple but powerful observation from [14] (for the convenience of the reader, a proof can be found in Appendix E). Lemma 5.7.…”
Section: Lemma 53 ([20]) Inf(h) Is Decidablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is decidable for languages of well-structured transition systems [12]. Furthermore, decidability still holds in many of these cases if one of the inputs is a general VASS language [14]. However, if both inputs are VASS languages, decidability of regular separability remains a challenging open problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the input languages are themselves regular and S is a subclass [42,41,40,39,43,44,35,15], then separability generalizes the classical subclass membership problem. Moreover, separability for languages of infinite-state systems has received a significant amount of attention [17,16,14,13,10,9,12,1,51,48,11,8]. Let us point out two prominent cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, a run is accepting if it reaches a final state with all counters being zero. While there have been several decidability results for subclasses of the VASS languages [17,14,13,10,9], the general case remains open. Second, a surprising result is that if K and L are coverability languages of well-structured transition systems (WSTS), then K and L are separable by a regular language if and only if they are disjoint [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over finite words, variants of the pC, Dq-separability problem have been studied for classes C both more general than the regular languages, such as the context free languages [22,49] and higher-order languages [14] (later extended to safe schemes over finite trees [1]), and for classes D more restrictive than the regular languages, such as in [39,40]. The separability and membership problems have also been studied for several classes of infinite-state systems, such as vector addition systems [11,10,23], well-structured transition systems [21], one-counter automata [20], and timed automata [13,12]. Recent developments on efficient algorithms solving parity games are based on the ability to find a simple separator, yielding both upper bounds on the problem, and lower bounds for a wide family of algorithms [5,19,Chapter 3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%