2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.12.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach to produce single and double layer graphene from re-exfoliation of expanded graphite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To affi rm the crystalline nature of the GO, a selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern was obtained for the GO (Figure 2 i, inset); it is quite similar to the typical six-fold symmetry obtained for graphite oxide, [ 24 ] suggesting that the obtained GO sheets were not completely amorphous. Importantly, it should be noticed from the SAED pattern that the inner hexagonal spots 1100 { } were more intense than the outer hexagonal spots 1120 { }, suggesting the presence of monolayer GO sheets rather than a multilayer; this agrees very well with previous reports, [ 25,26 ] and it is also consistent with our AFM results. The edge image of the monolayer GO at high magnifi cation is available in the SI ( Figure S3b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…To affi rm the crystalline nature of the GO, a selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern was obtained for the GO (Figure 2 i, inset); it is quite similar to the typical six-fold symmetry obtained for graphite oxide, [ 24 ] suggesting that the obtained GO sheets were not completely amorphous. Importantly, it should be noticed from the SAED pattern that the inner hexagonal spots 1100 { } were more intense than the outer hexagonal spots 1120 { }, suggesting the presence of monolayer GO sheets rather than a multilayer; this agrees very well with previous reports, [ 25,26 ] and it is also consistent with our AFM results. The edge image of the monolayer GO at high magnifi cation is available in the SI ( Figure S3b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Number of layers (thickness) TEM [21] AFM [21] Raman spectroscopy [21,22] Optical absorbance measurements [23] Lateral size TEM [21] SEM [21] AFM [24] Atomic C/O ratio XPS [13,16] Elemental analysis (ICP-MS) [25] [a] TEM: transmission electron microscopy, SEM: scanning electron microscopy, AFM: stomic force microscopy, ICP-MS: inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Table 2: Potential benefits associated with adoption of GBM nomenclature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The G band corresponds to the E 2 g phonon at the Brillion zone center. The D band is due to the breathing modes of sp 2 atoms and requires a defect for its activation and it only gives knowledge to the amount of disorder in the given structure (Ferrari and Robertson 2000;Dhakate et al 2011). Figure 3b shows the Raman spectra of CF and CF-Ni, consisting of two bands D and G appearing at Raman shift 1,350 and 1,598 cm -1 , respectively.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%