Proceedings 1995 INRIA/IEEE Symposium on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. ETFA'95
DOI: 10.1109/etfa.1995.496772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach to model and evaluate innovation and concurrent engineering projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These last points have been studied for a long time in telecommunication software development and in multi-tasks programming. Different approaches can be developed to ensure the global consistency of the project organisation (Allison, 1994) (Grunder et al, 1995). Our solution provides some graphical tools, taken from these approaches, in order to model collaborative work (Biennier et al, 1994).…”
Section: Integration Of the Project Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These last points have been studied for a long time in telecommunication software development and in multi-tasks programming. Different approaches can be developed to ensure the global consistency of the project organisation (Allison, 1994) (Grunder et al, 1995). Our solution provides some graphical tools, taken from these approaches, in order to model collaborative work (Biennier et al, 1994).…”
Section: Integration Of the Project Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been some methods for predicting a lead time of a project such as PERT and CPM [5]. CPM estimates a lead time by simply summing deterministic durations of activities in the critical path.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical path method (CPM) [3] and program evaluation and review technique (PERT) [3,4] are well-known approaches to solving this problem. Although they are well suited to analyze simple PD projects, they are not powerful enough for complex PD process because their assumptions are too strict to fully consider its complex structure [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%