1973
DOI: 10.1097/00002480-197301900-00054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approach to “Middle Molecules” Identification in Artificial Kidney Dialysate, With Reference to Neuropathy Prevention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

1978
1978
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Funck-Brentano and co-workers followed up a fraction from uremic serum which inhibited in vitro nervous con duction in isolated frog nerve [14,21,22,42,44]. After having tried various chromatographic systems [21,44], it appears that the authors [22] changed to a technique derived from that of Fürst et al [24] for the rapid testing of small quantities of serum (separation on Sephadex G15, then DEAE Sephadex A25 on microcolumn but using experiment conditions different from those used by Fürst et al).…”
Section: Methods For the Study And Classification O F M Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Funck-Brentano and co-workers followed up a fraction from uremic serum which inhibited in vitro nervous con duction in isolated frog nerve [14,21,22,42,44]. After having tried various chromatographic systems [21,44], it appears that the authors [22] changed to a technique derived from that of Fürst et al [24] for the rapid testing of small quantities of serum (separation on Sephadex G15, then DEAE Sephadex A25 on microcolumn but using experiment conditions different from those used by Fürst et al).…”
Section: Methods For the Study And Classification O F M Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After having tried various chromatographic systems [21,44], it appears that the authors [22] changed to a technique derived from that of Fürst et al [24] for the rapid testing of small quantities of serum (separation on Sephadex G15, then DEAE Sephadex A25 on microcolumn but using experiment conditions different from those used by Fürst et al). They thus found on Sephadex G15 that only one peak (peak b) inhibited nervous conduction, that it had a MW estimated by filtration on cellulose membranes [22] to be between 600 and 1,300 daltons and that it could be sub divided on DEAE Sephadex A25 into 6 peaks, only one of which (peak b4.2) was positive in the test.…”
Section: Methods For the Study And Classification O F M Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, they drew con troversial conclusions: along with studies in which an improvement o f the nerve conduc tion velocity (NCV) is evident [16,17], there are others [18] in which no significant varia tion was found either by clinical or by neuro physiological tests [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%