1993
DOI: 10.1016/0032-5910(93)80009-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach to improve the accuracy of sub-micron particle size distribution measurement using the Horiba CAPA-700

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to apply the light scattering correction [7,11] it is required to have absorbance data with a good plateau of constant absorbance values at the beginning and an end point of zero. In none of the cases was it possible to collect all the data in one size range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to apply the light scattering correction [7,11] it is required to have absorbance data with a good plateau of constant absorbance values at the beginning and an end point of zero. In none of the cases was it possible to collect all the data in one size range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle size distributions (PSD) of the precursor and ceramic powders were measured using a Horiba Capa 700 photo-centrifuge (without light scattering correction which will underestimate the finer fraction of the PSD [8]). The powders were dispersed in 2-propanol (Merck 818766) and treated for 5 min in an ultrasonic bath (Telsonic TUC 150).…”
Section: Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining Eqs. (2) and (3), the flux can be written as or (5) This partial differential equation can be solved with the Lagrange charac te ristics [ 13], which yields the following equation:…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in Figure I, there is a dec rement that is not due to sedimentati on of parti cles, bu t to rad ial and tange nti al dilution effects because of th e speed gradi ent and tan genti al di spl ace ment, res pectively. Hence in the traditi onal approaches th e latter decrement is th ought to be due to sed imentati on of particles of give n size past th e detec ti on poin t. As a furth er result, the particle size di stri buti ons obtained by thi s erroneo us approach are always ta iling [5] . If Figure I is traditi onall y approached, the fracti on of parti cles th at are considered to be larger than 2 IJ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation