2008
DOI: 10.3832/ifor0457-0010086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach to estimate carbon stocks change in forest carbon pools under the UNFCCC: the Italian case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
2
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
51
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same way, the value found for Q. ilex (0.357) is similar to that reported by Canadell and Roda (1991) in Cataluña, north-east Spain (0.41). In other cases, the results vary slightly from those of other studies, such as in the case of poplar for which Federici et al (2008) reports a value of 0.21 in Italy. Mokany et al (2006) presented root:shoot ratios according to vegetation categories, including oak forests where a value of 0.295 was found.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…In the same way, the value found for Q. ilex (0.357) is similar to that reported by Canadell and Roda (1991) in Cataluña, north-east Spain (0.41). In other cases, the results vary slightly from those of other studies, such as in the case of poplar for which Federici et al (2008) reports a value of 0.21 in Italy. Mokany et al (2006) presented root:shoot ratios according to vegetation categories, including oak forests where a value of 0.295 was found.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…The procedure used to estimate the quantity of carbon stored in forests follows the For-Est approach (Federici et al 2008), based on the IPCC "Good Practice Guidance for Land use, land-use Change and Forestry" (IPCC 2003). The annual forest capacity to transform atmospheric carbon into biomass was estimated considering three carbon pools: above-ground biomass, belowground biomass and deadwood.…”
Section: Benefi T Transfer Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of BEF and BWD are taken from Federici et al (2008). The factors 0.5 and 100 are respectively ap plied to convert from carbon to dry matter content and from g m -2 to Mg ha -1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%