2013 International Conference on Electrical Information and Communication Technology (EICT) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/eict.2014.6777883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach to develop an effective job rotation schedule by using genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [4] the proposed model adds posture diversity to reduce the accumulated risk of body postures. Additionally, a study (2014) with the purpose to reduce repetitive task sequences based on ergonomic, environmental, competence and skill factors was found [8].…”
Section: Literature Revisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4] the proposed model adds posture diversity to reduce the accumulated risk of body postures. Additionally, a study (2014) with the purpose to reduce repetitive task sequences based on ergonomic, environmental, competence and skill factors was found [8].…”
Section: Literature Revisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there is slightly increment in average response time with respect to increase in workload λ. On the whole, LJF scheduling algorithm performs worst not only alone but with combined FCFS as well [12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing job rotation programs are focused primarily on managing biomechanical and organizational risks [6]. Analytical models focused on integrating these two perspectives include factors such as details of work contracts (work shifts, part-time, flexible scheduling), worker preferences, level of production, skills, training, physical capacity and experience, as well as the effects of learning [13,[21][22][23][24], exposure to noise, physical workload or anthropometric data [13,22,23,[25][26][27][28][29], age [11,14] and cognitive ergonomic factors such as human reliability or task complexity [27,30,31].…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Integrating variables from work sciences into existing process scheduling or balancing models via constraints in the model [21,32]; • Treating the staff allocation problem as a multi-criteria/objective decision problem [21,24]; • Building a model based on heuristics or meta-heuristics (artificial intelligence approaches) such as genetic algorithms, the simulated annealing algorithm or ant algorithm [22,25,28] fuzzy logic [27] or particle swarms [26] to integrate certain operational risks into risks identified in work science [6]; • Building a model based on integer (linear or nonlinear)…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%