2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:jims.0000034118.19127.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach to determine geometric feasibility to assembly states by intersection matrices in assembly sequence planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al [9] coupled the solution space generation and disassembly solution optimization into one technical framework, represented all assembly/disassembly sequences in the DFIG (disassembly feasibility information graph) model, and proposed an integrated methodology for mechanical assembly planning. Sinanoǧlu and Börklü [10] proposed an approach for the development of a process for the determination of geometric feasibility whose binary vector representation corresponds to assembly states. Zhong et al [11] presented a determination system of assembly units for the hull structure in order to shorten construction cycle time and construction quality in shipbuilding and introduced the assessment model by fuzzy synthetic evaluation.…”
Section: Assembly Sequence Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [9] coupled the solution space generation and disassembly solution optimization into one technical framework, represented all assembly/disassembly sequences in the DFIG (disassembly feasibility information graph) model, and proposed an integrated methodology for mechanical assembly planning. Sinanoǧlu and Börklü [10] proposed an approach for the development of a process for the determination of geometric feasibility whose binary vector representation corresponds to assembly states. Zhong et al [11] presented a determination system of assembly units for the hull structure in order to shorten construction cycle time and construction quality in shipbuilding and introduced the assessment model by fuzzy synthetic evaluation.…”
Section: Assembly Sequence Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4] a classification of the different types of connections is provided, and in [18,6] the graphs of connections are represented as liaison matrices. There are also more particular representations [21] where predicates are used to specify the relative positions of the different parts (part 1 on top of 2, part 2 at +x with respect to part 5, etc.).…”
Section: Geometric Analysis and Problem Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AND branches represent the disassembly of a part (or a subset of parts), whereas the OR branches (different paths from the same node) represent different disassembly options. In a later stage, it is possible to analyze the feasibility of the sequences using knowledge databases [4], geometrical approaches [18], ad-hoc algorithms [23] that differentiate parts and connectors, or building Non-Directional Blocking Graphs [22]. Finally, an algorithm based on the so-called motion space is presented in [7].…”
Section: Geometric Analysis and Problem Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this system, in order to get contact matrices in the direction of Cartesian coordinate axis, assembly view of pincer system was used. These matrices were automatically constructed (Sinanoğlu & Börklü, 2004). Contact matrices of the pincer assembly system are also shown in Fig.…”
Section: Definition Of Contact Matrices and Acgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning module scans various assembly views of any product whose assembly view is produced by CAD packet program in the computer environment and determines to contact and interference relations between parts (Sinanoğlu & Börklü, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%