2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approach to Analyze the Performance of Advanced Manufacturing Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A holonic system was required to handle disturbance, support human integration, and provide reliability, robustness, and flexibility in coping with changes, and a system design was evaluated based on reliability, responsiveness, flexibility, cost, and assets. Mahmood et al [62] used modeling and simulation to assess the performance of applied technologies in integrated production lines while only the performances at shop-floor level were evaluated without the consideration of external partners and end-users. Burggra et al [63] compared the performances of artificial intelligence (AI) and human beings in job-shop scheduling of a cyber-production management system using a reinforcement learning algorithm.…”
Section: Performance Metrics (Pms) For System Smartnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A holonic system was required to handle disturbance, support human integration, and provide reliability, robustness, and flexibility in coping with changes, and a system design was evaluated based on reliability, responsiveness, flexibility, cost, and assets. Mahmood et al [62] used modeling and simulation to assess the performance of applied technologies in integrated production lines while only the performances at shop-floor level were evaluated without the consideration of external partners and end-users. Burggra et al [63] compared the performances of artificial intelligence (AI) and human beings in job-shop scheduling of a cyber-production management system using a reinforcement learning algorithm.…”
Section: Performance Metrics (Pms) For System Smartnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most models lack consistent data, reliable analysis methods, and user-friendly tools for decision makers to assess system performance in an understandable way [59]. The performance assessment methods fail to match advanced technologies to market demands in manufacturing [60]. Few methods were available to design and evaluate system configurations and implement a smart manufacturing system based on a set of the specified assessment metrics.…”
Section: Limitations Of Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%