2013
DOI: 10.3182/20130619-3-ru-3018.00497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approach to Analysis of Expert Estimation Validity in Cognitive Mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It consists in the inevitable and significant participation of people (experts, stakeholders, moderators) in solving problems through formal methods. The practical significance of this problem in cognitive mapping is justified and empirically confirmed [6], [11], [12]. Not only do researchers in cognitive mapping directly or indirectly talk about risks for validity (or directly errors), but also in the related area of system dynamics [13], [14]; different approaches are proposed to reduce the role of risks in the construction of cognitive maps.…”
Section: Collective Cognitive Map Construction 21 the State Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It consists in the inevitable and significant participation of people (experts, stakeholders, moderators) in solving problems through formal methods. The practical significance of this problem in cognitive mapping is justified and empirically confirmed [6], [11], [12]. Not only do researchers in cognitive mapping directly or indirectly talk about risks for validity (or directly errors), but also in the related area of system dynamics [13], [14]; different approaches are proposed to reduce the role of risks in the construction of cognitive maps.…”
Section: Collective Cognitive Map Construction 21 the State Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Rejection of the typical procedure for the CCM construction: a formal integration of several cognitive maps by averaging the influence weights. It is caused by a lack of knowledge of acceptable validity necessary for estimating influences' weights in the map (confirmed by studies on the expert estimation problem in cognitive mapping [12]).…”
Section: The Main Ideas Of Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multicriteria decision-making tasks based on hierarchy analysis have been discussed to improve the consistency of experts (Khatwani and Kar, 2016) and establish the accuracy of expert evaluation of the object state by pairwise comparison with a quantitative assessment of preferences (Radaev, 2007). The consistency of expert evaluations is established by mapping on a Cartesian plane (Abramova and Telitsyna, 2013;Wilson et al, 2018;Risvik et al, 1994;Hopfer and Heymann, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%