2018
DOI: 10.1002/fld.4486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach of dynamic mesh adaptation for simulating 3‐dimensional unsteady moving‐immersed‐boundary flows

Abstract: This work is the first endeavor to combine dynamic adaptation of tetrahedral mesh with an immersed boundary method for simulating 3D moving‐boundary flows. The complexity of adaptive mesh generation is reduced by implementing the rule that the level difference of neighboring cells never exceeds 1. The geometric quality of mesh does not degrade as the mesh level increases and the error caused by each solution transferring from the old mesh to the new one is relatively small.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of the solution domain is 14 L × 4 L × 2 L . The approach of dynamic mesh adaptation proposed by Peng and Zhou is employed and the initial uniform mesh contains 57 × 23 × 13 = 17 043 nodes. For the adaptive meshes, the mesh interval near the fish surface is about 6 × 10 −3 .…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of the solution domain is 14 L × 4 L × 2 L . The approach of dynamic mesh adaptation proposed by Peng and Zhou is employed and the initial uniform mesh contains 57 × 23 × 13 = 17 043 nodes. For the adaptive meshes, the mesh interval near the fish surface is about 6 × 10 −3 .…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A crucial step in the numerical prediction of water entry is the simulation of large deformation of the free interface and the boundary conditions of the dynamic mesh [10]. The simulation of large deformation of free interface mainly includes two types: one is the interface tracking technology, and the other is the interface capture technology [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then this technique has been applied and developed by many researchers (Chen, Lien and Leschziner, 1997;Henshaw and Schwendeman, 2008;Holst and Pulliam, 2009;Angelidis, Chawdhary and Sotiropoulos, 2016). Although AMR method is accurate and efficient for steady problems (Alauzet and Loseille, 2010;Jones, Nielsen and Park, 2006;Michal and Krakos, 2012) several drawbacks are associated with this method for unsteady flows (Hornung, Wissink and Kohn, 2006;Alauzet et al, 2018;Peng and Zhou, 2018;Angelidis et al, 2016). The most important problem is the latency between the mesh and flow solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%