2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach for wellbore failure analysis using rock cavings and image processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15); such splintery cavings are produced Fig. 11 Induced pore pressure at a circular borehole wall based on the anisotropic approach (the Amadei solution + anisotropic poroelasticity) for the stiffer grain case in zones where tensile failures occur throughout the wellbore circumference (Skea et al 2018). The difference between the two approaches is largely due to the induced pore pressure, which is associated with anisotropy in Skempton's parameters and in-situ stress state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15); such splintery cavings are produced Fig. 11 Induced pore pressure at a circular borehole wall based on the anisotropic approach (the Amadei solution + anisotropic poroelasticity) for the stiffer grain case in zones where tensile failures occur throughout the wellbore circumference (Skea et al 2018). The difference between the two approaches is largely due to the induced pore pressure, which is associated with anisotropy in Skempton's parameters and in-situ stress state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Similarly, the anisotropic approach gives negative principal effective stress at sides of borehole for wellbore orientations f and g. The negative principal effective stress is caused by the negative radial effective stress, which may trigger the radial tensile failure (tensile failures throughout the wellbore circumference) (Fjaer et al 2008;Skea et al 2018). Fig.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is thus necessary to consider their influence when conducting a rigorous wellbore stability analysis, particularly when drilling in a depleted reservoir. Maintaining stability of a wellbore and strengthening the wellbore wall have been widely studied in the literature (Gao et al, 2022;Gholilou et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2023;Marbun et al, 2011;Singh et al, 2019;Skea et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2021). Among these, wellbore instability in shales is important as the shales are clay-rich formations forming the most abundant sedimentary rocks (around 70%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is suggested that considering a poroelastic model rather than pure elastic may vary mud windows' minimum and maximum limits by about 12.5% and 25%, respectively (Darvishpour et al, 2019;Kianoush et al, 2023b;Rafieepour et al, 2020;Shad et al, 2022;Shahbazi et al, 2020). Although linear elasticity modeling has been used for different studies, it does not consider porous media effects (Alberty and McLean, 2001;Michael and Gupta, 2022;Skea et al, 2018). The poroelastic concept recognizes pore pressure and its diffusion effects to evolve more realistic understandings regarding various stresses or failure conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%