2019 IEEE XXVIII International Scientific Conference Electronics (ET) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/et.2019.8878587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approach for Printing Tissue-mimicking Abnormalities Dedicated to Applications in Breast Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed increase of peak power was as large 30%-40% for sample thickness less than 50 mm. We note that FDM printing strategies have been reported which may eliminate this source of spatial non-uniformity when realizing variabledensity (non-homogeneous) realistic breast phantoms (Okkalidis 2018, Daskalov et al 2019, Dukov et al 2019b, Dukov et al 2022. As regards the object repeatability/reproducibility in 3D printing sessions, in terms of object average density, dimensional deviations were observed not exceeding 1%, both intra-session (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The observed increase of peak power was as large 30%-40% for sample thickness less than 50 mm. We note that FDM printing strategies have been reported which may eliminate this source of spatial non-uniformity when realizing variabledensity (non-homogeneous) realistic breast phantoms (Okkalidis 2018, Daskalov et al 2019, Dukov et al 2019b, Dukov et al 2022. As regards the object repeatability/reproducibility in 3D printing sessions, in terms of object average density, dimensional deviations were observed not exceeding 1%, both intra-session (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The developed tool was used in a series of image evaluation studies [49][50][51][52][53]. In the following paragraph, we show the use of the tool in two original research applications in the field of x-ray breast imaging: (1) evaluation of the features from a series of left and right (pairs) CC breast clinical mammograms, and (2) evaluation of the suitability of newly proposed and developed breast phantoms for x-ray-based imaging.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FDM technology was chosen for manufacturing of torso phantoms (Craft and Howell 2017), a finger phantom (Savi et al 2020) and dosimetry phantoms for evaluating the effects of newly produced implants (Goodall et al 2021), as well as pelvic phantoms for optimisation of preoperative CT scans (Hamedani et al 2018), and chest, neck, head phantoms (Kamomae et al 2017, Okkalidis 2018, Okkalidis and Marinakis 2020 and lung tissues (Mei et al 2022). In the field of mammography, phantoms for imaging purposes were manufactured with a FDM printer by both UNINA and Varna research groups (Bliznakova et al 2020, Dukov et al 2019, Feradov et al 2020 through exploiting one or two filament materials to reproduce the two main tissues in the breast: the gland and the adipose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%